Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thank you Anderson Cooper. 'No evidence that we could find that Snowden is a Russian Spy'! [View all]Response to NCTraveler (Reply #43)
HangOnKids This message was self-deleted by its author.
Edit history
Cannot view edit history for self-deleted messages.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
109 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Thank you Anderson Cooper. 'No evidence that we could find that Snowden is a Russian Spy'! [View all]
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
OP
You mean Rogers? Who knows, now that he has been challenged for proof, he's in hiding!
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#2
I don't think he /she means Rodgers....they mean Cooper...what evidence did they present ?
pkdu
Jan 2014
#6
That is not the question people should be asking. CNN contacted Rogers who refused to speak to them.
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#7
Thank yuou Titowan, just saw it on DU. Excellent questions and answers from Snowden. So glad he is
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#67
Cooper should defend his statement with evidence , as a reporter, abso- fuckin- lutely. Nt
pkdu
Jan 2014
#64
I have no doubt you have some evidence of the ridiculous claim or you would never, ever
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#24
My dearest Sabrina--you misunderstand. Since Snowden is represented by an FSB lawyer, and
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#25
Got some links to what this lawyer has said? And the lawyer's name. I have no doubts otoh
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#34
Seriously....you don't know who Snowden's lawyer in Russia is? He's a book-lender. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#35
Yes, of course I know, I know who his lawyers are here. Care to provide the link where his lawyer
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#36
I read what you wrote. You have no doubt that Cooper spoke to Anatoly Kucherena
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#42
Don't worry, I get it, lol! Are you claiming that Snowden has no US attorneys?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#46
Since the US stranded Snowden in Russia where he did not want to be, his father retained
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#48
After he was stranded in Russia by the US Government his father retained a US Attorney for him. I
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#53
Could you please state your opinion on the Republican moron who is currently in hiding, who
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#59
So is Snowden a Russian Spy or not, in your opinion? Is there some reason why you are avoiding the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#61
I never answer your questions. Tell me the name of Snowden's attorney, Sabrina!!!
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#62
Why don't you tell us the name of Snowden's attorney, I know you're dying to and we all know why!
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#65
Just tell us the name of.Mr. Snowden's American attorney. You seem to know it! nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#83
The ACLU has not been retained by Mr. Snowden, nor have they entered an appearance
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#88
You're now citing Tucker Carlson???? Fail..and lemme 'splain something to you....
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#93
Of course she knew and probably had a couple of links ready to try to discredit them. Isn't
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#86
Benjamin Wizner and Jessica Radack. Wizner is with the ACLU and Radack, a whistleblower herself...
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#91
Sabrina, I don't answer your questions. you earned the honor of being the only DUer whose
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#98
You do answer my questions. See the previous sub thread. It's the other way around, I don't answer
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#99
Yeah...I don't click on the malware at Tucker Carlson's site. Do you have an actual.cite. nt
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#102
You're provided a link and won't open it? Then want to claim ignorance?
riderinthestorm
Jan 2014
#103
It's a game, which I have always refused to play. And each time when someone provides the supposed
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#105
Seem you think badly of anyone that embarrasse your authoritarian leader figures Clapper and Alexand
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#50
I asked how you rationalize supporting strong authoritarian Republicans like Clapper and Alexander.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#68
Actually, in this thread I'm just trying to.find out who has been retained by Mr. Snowden
msanthrope
Jan 2014
#85
Those two Clapper and Alexender are Bush loyalists. Makes you wonder why they were fired five years
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#66
I wish it were that simple. Had you asked that of Obama, he wouldnt have told you
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#69
Write someone in. If enough people did that, what would happen? Let's say a movement grew among the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#71
If you could get enough votes to be a spoiler, then maybe the Democratic Party would
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#73
"other than the Republican's statements..." and a certain particularly vocal contingent on DU
Electric Monk
Jan 2014
#3
You're not the only one who wonders why they bother to come here where their views are so much in
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#5
I hope they bring some evidence with them. So far, like CNN, I've had no luck getting anything other
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#8
They have lots of Commie conspiracy theoriies. The vivid old cold war imaginings similar to the
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#26
is Anderson seeking 'relevance' or is he an 'egotist' as claimed about Snowden or Assange?
Swagman
Jan 2014
#11
I think Snowden is irrelevant at this point, but how can anyone look at either of those
Egalitarian Thug
Jan 2014
#12
It could be because Rogers statement was so outrageous and the Media has become so irrelvant itself
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#27
You noticed that too? Never a shred of evidence offered. The old accusation by inference tactic
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#49
The right wing corporate media is not trustworthy. Which is why Rogers took his Conspiracy Theory to
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#28
I trust CNN over a repub like Mike Rogers. Why do you trust wingnut republicans?
last1standing
Jan 2014
#76
Compared to Congress' and especially Republicans in Congress? Latest polls show young people
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#30
Those defending him from smears are defending Whistle Blowers, not especially him. Just as they
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#39
Who in this world should care about their Government Officials lying to them?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#41
It is pretty clear I am addressing some of the right people. Not all of them of course.
NCTraveler
Jan 2014
#43
Whistle Blowers laws don't need to be changed, they need to be abided by. Throwing Whistle Blowers
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#44
If a Republican says it must be true is what you're saying? I don't want to misunderstand your
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#55
Guity till proved innocent, huh? Accused without proof by a wingnut and you support that.
last1standing
Jan 2014
#77
Exactly, they stranded him in Russia and more and more people are asking 'WHY'?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#75
He should have had better advisors, they could have told him if he had a warrant for felony
Thinkingabout
Jan 2014
#79
I don't need to check, I know what would happen if someone didn't have a passport. That
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#81
And he was issued an Ecuadorian travel document (later revoked) in order to leave Hong Kong.
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#92
That is a shame. I read that and hope he is in a better job by now. He is so right, the world
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#108