Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Lawmakers Consider Preventing ALL Marriage In Oklahoma [View all]

OKLAHOMA CITY - State lawmakers are considering throwing out marriage in Oklahoma.
The idea stems from a bill filed by Rep. Mike Turner (R-Edmond). Turner says it's an attempt to keep same-sex marriage illegal in Oklahoma while satisfying the U.S. Constitution. Critics are calling it a political stunt while supporters say it's what Oklahomans want.
"[My constituents are] willing to have that discussion about whether marriage needs to be regulated by the state at all," Turner said.
Other conservative lawmakers feel the same way, according to Turner.
"Would it be realistic for the State of Oklahoma to say, We're not going to do marriage period,'" asked News 9's Michael Konopasek.
"That would definitely be a realistic opportunity, and it's something that would be part of the discussion," Turner answered.
Such a discussion will be made possible by a current shell bill -- something that can be changed at almost any time to react to upcoming rulings on Oklahoma's same-sex marriage ban.
"I think that, especially with issues like this, [these lawmakers are] out of touch with most Oklahomans," said Ryan Kiesel, ACLU Oklahoma executive detector.
Kiesel says prohibiting all marriage is new territory. In fact, the ACLU was unable to find an example of where a state has ever tried to ban all marriage. Kiesel believes the entire idea just boils down to politics.
http://www.newson6.com/story/24543033/lawmakers-consider-preventing-all-marriage-in-oklahoma
The idea stems from a bill filed by Rep. Mike Turner (R-Edmond). Turner says it's an attempt to keep same-sex marriage illegal in Oklahoma while satisfying the U.S. Constitution. Critics are calling it a political stunt while supporters say it's what Oklahomans want.
"[My constituents are] willing to have that discussion about whether marriage needs to be regulated by the state at all," Turner said.
Other conservative lawmakers feel the same way, according to Turner.
"Would it be realistic for the State of Oklahoma to say, We're not going to do marriage period,'" asked News 9's Michael Konopasek.
"That would definitely be a realistic opportunity, and it's something that would be part of the discussion," Turner answered.
Such a discussion will be made possible by a current shell bill -- something that can be changed at almost any time to react to upcoming rulings on Oklahoma's same-sex marriage ban.
"I think that, especially with issues like this, [these lawmakers are] out of touch with most Oklahomans," said Ryan Kiesel, ACLU Oklahoma executive detector.
Kiesel says prohibiting all marriage is new territory. In fact, the ACLU was unable to find an example of where a state has ever tried to ban all marriage. Kiesel believes the entire idea just boils down to politics.
http://www.newson6.com/story/24543033/lawmakers-consider-preventing-all-marriage-in-oklahoma
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Many people have tried to make this argument, few of them have really thought it through
Bjorn Against
Jan 2014
#15
The tax code is modified continuously by every legislative session in every state in the union
Major Nikon
Jan 2014
#17
You don't seem to be able to recognize the difference between private and governmental entities
Major Nikon
Jan 2014
#28
Marriage law is not private, marriages require a state issued marriage license under current law.
Bjorn Against
Jan 2014
#31
Well if the law were changed as you suggest it should be you would see it is not quite so simple
Bjorn Against
Jan 2014
#34
Link me to a Noam Chomsky piece in which he calls for the privatization of marriage
Bjorn Against
Jan 2014
#36
As if it wasn't clear enough I already explained to you why I mentioned Chomsky
Major Nikon
Jan 2014
#46
No they do not have the authority to deny a license for "all sorts of reasons"
Bjorn Against
Jan 2014
#63
I think most people reading this thread will see who is intellectually bankrupt, and it is not me
Bjorn Against
Jan 2014
#67
You're not married, are you? There are health and financial issues also to consider.
WinkyDink
Jan 2014
#19