My 911 Call, The "Attempted Murder" of My Daughter, & Oppression of the Family Death Penalty

[Land Shark]

124. "Better safe than sorry" here means innocents get hurt. How's that fair or just?

And how can it be just for innocents to be greatly injured so that some bureaucrat feels they are less subject to criticism, or so that somebody else (a member of the public perhaps) feels a little better about the situation they are merely reading about?

By "innocents" I mean, of course, children who are denied visitation with a mother they love all so that some other people who don't even know the children, can feel a little bit better? "Understandable" does not mean justifiable, right, fair or kind in these instances.

The difference between CPS and Karita is that Karita has never intentionally hurt a single living thing, much less a child. But CPS often hurts children greatly, so it can feel "better safe than sorry."

But you, RobinA, are basically agreeing with the above in your reply above, so thanks for your reply. FWIW, another line of self-justification CPS uses is that "we have to do this" (they take an expansive view of their "duty to file&quot , so at that level they are saying they can not help themselves, which if true, would make the crux of an UNsuccessful insanity defense on their part.