General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Trend-starting Texas drops algebra II mandate [View all]exboyfil
(18,332 posts)My oldest daughter is not doing any literature past the 10th grade. I am ok with that. She will have two years of engineering done while in High School. She is a very good communicator (both written and with video documentaries). As I have gotten older I have changed my opinions on classical literature. I used to be in favor of it, but I am not entirely sure what an individual gets out of it now. I read mostly non-fiction including Scientific American cover to cover. I occasionally get out my Shakespeare, but I find it is a far better experience to watch it than read it.
I think in English class you should write about things that are important and read a wide variety of non-fiction including history, science, and politics to become a better citizen. Why should we expect literature of the past to be superior to that of today. That is not true with science for example. You can honor and recognize the achievements of the past, but you don't learn about evolution from "On the Origin of Species".
If you enjoy the literature that is one thing, but as the language and approaches continue to change, that enjoyment becomes less and less. Is the work to reach the level of understanding to bridge 400+ years worth the effort given the other academic things which need to be accomplished? How many times do you want to hear "rosy-fingered dawn"?