If the U.S. military fires upon someone, is that all the proof needed that the target was guilty?

[Bodhi BloodWave]

130. Obviously then it would suck to be you, if you were such a threat

Now would you mind telling me what you consider to be valid evidence tho since you seem to demand it all the time?
*
some would point to the fact that Ibrahim al-Banna was in charge of the media arm of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula as a good enough reason to make him a valid military target.

Others might point to the fact that he was wanted internationally for planning attacks both inside and outside of Yemen as a reason making him a valid target.
*
And two more questions to end my post

1: explain to me/us how exactly you would go about arresting a 'suspected' terrorist in a warzone that was more or less under their control(now I consider him a terrorist but since you don't i added the 'suspected')?

and 2: Who would you send to make such an arrest and how many dead amongst them would you be willing to accept to make a successful arrest?