Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Krugman: Obama and the One Percent [View all]hfojvt
(37,573 posts)12. failing to mention the richest 5% IS the lie
the REAL discussion is about "inequality".
To talk about the 1% avoids a huge part of that issue. Again, Krugman should know better.
The top 10% takes almost 50% of the pie. The top 1% takes 20% and the top 9% takes 30%.
If Obama, with Krugman's cheering, enacts policies which reduce the top 1% to 10% while maintaining the top 10% at 50% that does nothing for the bottom 90%.
But if you, Krugman, and Obama want to distract us with the top 1% as a way to screw the bottom 80%, then how dare I get in the way of "progress"?
And to continue to assert that "I don't understand the tax code" because I don't like tax cuts for the rich, is just pure ad hominem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
tax rates apply to adjusted dollars. The tax loop holes greatly impact actual taxed dollars
Herself
Jan 2014
#1
Uh oh, I suspect Krugman is now going to get thrown under the bus for praising Obama.
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#3
Snarks, and boojums, come from Lewis Carroll's 'The Hunting of the Snark'
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#50
so, anyone who doesn't declare class war on the upper middle class is a fraud in your estimation nt
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#48
I guess you could have cut a better deal by waving your Internet magic stick
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#97
Sadly, Kraugman has become a full time cheerleader for this administration. Bummer. nt
Demo_Chris
Jan 2014
#32
Ouch! Shoot that messenger! Times are tough when Nobel-prize winning liberal economist has to
pampango
Jan 2014
#39
rule of practice: when one person argues with numbers, and the other responds
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#47
FDR was a millionaire. It seems possible to be a millionaire and a liberal at the same time. n/t
pampango
Jan 2014
#75
So liberal economists are judged by different rules than liberal politicians. Got it.
pampango
Jan 2014
#78
No, it simply supports my contention that it would have to have roughly doubled. nt
MannyGoldstein
Jan 2014
#57