Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)

23. i have been thinking about this. what i see, it is not about ALL of women, but individual

Reply to kpete (Original post)

Sun Mar 18, 2012, 04:49 PM

Mar 2012

there is not the sense of responsibility to all women. it is responsibility to self. so you have all these laws being passed effecting the younger women and they dont have the sense of solidarity. they are taught that it is individual empowerment. whereas you see the older women stepping up, speaking out like the steinmans and fondas cause that is what the movement was in the past

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So the NYT wonders why all these years later, no one has stepped up to fill Gloria Steinhem's shoes [View all] kpete Mar 2012 OP

Maybe because women aren't second class anymore. dkf Mar 2012 #1

Yet ProSense Mar 2012 #3

Does the phrase "women's rights" only pertain to the ability to prevent/terminate pregnancies? dkf Mar 2012 #6

We've noticed your opposition to women's reproductive rights. kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #15

I have no opposition to it. It's a personal thing. dkf Mar 2012 #16

Why does the government get involved with this at all? Isn't it no one else's business? dkf Mar 2012 #18

This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Mar 2012 #19

I pay taxes and I'm sick of this argument. It will never be resolved. dkf Mar 2012 #20

This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Mar 2012 #21

We shouldn't have to pay for wars that aren't properly declared. dkf Mar 2012 #22

But do african americans in 2012 need another Martin Luther King? lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #12

Well, yes... ananda Mar 2012 #2

It's like ProSense Mar 2012 #4

Have they questioned who will fill the shoes for Phyllis Schafley? LiberalFighter Mar 2012 #5

I'd stipulate that Gloria Steinem could be viewed as the "tip of the spear" for feminism riderinthestorm Mar 2012 #7

a lot of what you say is true bonnieS Mar 2012 #17

If the reason Gloria Steinem has no successors is that Sandra Fluke was bullied Zalatix Mar 2012 #8

Seems to me MadrasT Mar 2012 #9

why? because there`s tens of millions of gloria steinhems across the country madrchsod Mar 2012 #10

There's a 25-point gender gap in our favor BeyondGeography Mar 2012 #11

The fact that this article got parked in "Fashion and Style" LadyHawkAZ Mar 2012 #13

There was only one Gloria Steinem Kath1 Mar 2012 #14

i have been thinking about this. what i see, it is not about ALL of women, but individual seabeyond Mar 2012 #23