Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Breaking: "First Degree Homicide Of The Unborn Child Bill" Passes CO House On Second Reading [View all]Bolo Boffin
(23,872 posts)117. Found this article on Twitter re: meth lab laws in Alabama being used to prosecute pregnant women
60 so far...
http://www.alternet.org/reproductivejustice/154586/how_the_%22pro-life%22_movement_puts_women_behind_bars
These women are being prosecuted under Alabamas 2006 law designed to provide special penalties for people who bring children into methamphetamine laboratories. Its official title is "Endangerment of Exposing a Child to an Environment in Which Controlled Substances are Produced or Distributed" and it provides that a person commits the crime of chemical endangerment by exposing a child to an environment in which he or she...knowingly, recklessly, or intentionally causes or permits a child to be exposed to, to ingest or inhale, or to have contact with a controlled substance.
This law makes no mention of pregnancy, pregnant woman, drug use, fetus, or any other words that would make it applicable to a pregnant woman who uses a controlled substance and seeks to continue her pregnancy to term. In fact, the Alabama legislature has repeatedly refused to amend this law or to create others that would address the issue of pregnancy and drug use through the criminal law.
Nevertheless prosecutors have argued, and the Alabamas Court of Criminal Appeals has agreed, that the word child in the statute includes a viable fetus and therefore may be used to arrest and jail women who become pregnant, eschew abortion, go to term, and try to bring life into this world, despite having used a controlled substance.
This law makes no mention of pregnancy, pregnant woman, drug use, fetus, or any other words that would make it applicable to a pregnant woman who uses a controlled substance and seeks to continue her pregnancy to term. In fact, the Alabama legislature has repeatedly refused to amend this law or to create others that would address the issue of pregnancy and drug use through the criminal law.
Nevertheless prosecutors have argued, and the Alabamas Court of Criminal Appeals has agreed, that the word child in the statute includes a viable fetus and therefore may be used to arrest and jail women who become pregnant, eschew abortion, go to term, and try to bring life into this world, despite having used a controlled substance.
That's the crazy thing about this: the prosecutions are of women who are carrying the baby to term! Of course it's a terrible thing for a pregnant woman to use drugs, but it should be possible to penalize those things without entrenching the notion of a fetus being a person further into law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
119 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Breaking: "First Degree Homicide Of The Unborn Child Bill" Passes CO House On Second Reading [View all]
babylonsister
Mar 2012
OP
I want to know who's building the jails and paying the legal fees. This is whacked! nt
babylonsister
Mar 2012
#2
So if a woman has an ectopic pregnancy that can never be viable & could cause serious complications
Pachamama
Mar 2012
#78
Handmaids Tale.....Vessels for their Sperm and religious reasoning indeed....
Pachamama
Mar 2012
#87
And the men who caused the pregnancy should be arrested, also. I feel for the cops of Colorado.
judesedit
Mar 2012
#49
oh no...the men who caused it.....will be entitled to accuse as co-plaintiff with the State
BlancheSplanchnik
Mar 2012
#57
Roe vs Wade is being eroded,yet it still holds. We must make our voices heard and
The Wielding Truth
Mar 2012
#15
Gov might be waiting till many pass. Then after the election? Strike them as unconstitutional
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#33
Yes. The anti-abortion strategy is: local, incrementalist saturation. About 145 bills this year?
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#100
Many states are passing these regulations so they will take effect immediatly
Arkansas Granny
Mar 2012
#105
Women need to go all Lysistrata until these idiots quit trying to destroy our rights!
pink-o
Mar 2012
#21
I believe that to be a good idea, sane males will abstain voluntarily in solidarity
Dragonfli
Mar 2012
#85
I am sick and tired of religion dictating what should be law in this fucked up country.
L0oniX
Mar 2012
#30
Will they investigate every miscarriage? Women need to send in used tampons/pads to
uppityperson
Mar 2012
#34
Looks like it's balls-out for the rightwing with the next election looming.
AtomicKitten
Mar 2012
#45
Ladies, it's time for a mass exodus OUT of Colorado. Maybe they'll get it when we hit their wallets.
judesedit
Mar 2012
#47
The father of the child should have to sign docs stating he will raise the child if the woman can't
judesedit
Mar 2012
#50
Who's behind all these anti-abortion efforts? In part, "Priests for Life"; "Personhood USA." Etc.?
Brettongarcia
Mar 2012
#116
Found this article on Twitter re: meth lab laws in Alabama being used to prosecute pregnant women
Bolo Boffin
Mar 2012
#117
How many of the legislature's "Yea" voters will be adopting unwanted children?
AlbertCat
Mar 2012
#103
OMG! This just shocked me beyond words. IF this does pass WE Women might as well
Justice wanted
Mar 2012
#106