Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Krugman: Obama and the One Percent [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)89. Heh, classic ODS.
Whose idea was the Making work pay credit.
It was "campaign Obama".
Then it was abandoned by "President Obama"
It was "campaign Obama".
Then it was abandoned by "President Obama"
Reality:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Making_Work_Pay_tax_credit
The Making Work Pay Tax Credit was a tax credit allowed by the Internal Revenue Service of the United States.[1] It was authorized in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
The credit was given at a rate of 6.2 percent of earned income up to a maximum of $400 for individuals or $800 for married taxpayers. Making Work Pay could be claimed by single filers making between $8,100 per year and $95,000 per year. Joint filers in the range of $8,100 and $190,000 could claim it annually. Typically employers reduced withholding to provide an increase in take-home pay without any effort required from taxpayers. If the taxpayer had multiple jobs or was self-employed, they needed to adjust withholding. However, if the worker had multiple jobs or was unemployed, they had the option to receive the credit via lump sum (all $400 to $800 at once) after tax day.
The key thought behind the Making Work Pay tax credit was to stimulate consumer spending. In fact, the credit was the key policy in President Barack Obama's stimulus package in 2009.
The credit was given at a rate of 6.2 percent of earned income up to a maximum of $400 for individuals or $800 for married taxpayers. Making Work Pay could be claimed by single filers making between $8,100 per year and $95,000 per year. Joint filers in the range of $8,100 and $190,000 could claim it annually. Typically employers reduced withholding to provide an increase in take-home pay without any effort required from taxpayers. If the taxpayer had multiple jobs or was self-employed, they needed to adjust withholding. However, if the worker had multiple jobs or was unemployed, they had the option to receive the credit via lump sum (all $400 to $800 at once) after tax day.
The key thought behind the Making Work Pay tax credit was to stimulate consumer spending. In fact, the credit was the key policy in President Barack Obama's stimulus package in 2009.
A household making $100K is not 'rich.' Two teachers in NYC making $75K are not rich, they can afford to buy maybe a crappy 2br apartment in Queens. Maybe.
Your bizarre notion that households making over $100K--including firefighters, teachers, and bus drivers:
http://www.mta.info/nyct/hr/postings/skilled.htm
--are rich does not trump reality.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
tax rates apply to adjusted dollars. The tax loop holes greatly impact actual taxed dollars
Herself
Jan 2014
#1
Uh oh, I suspect Krugman is now going to get thrown under the bus for praising Obama.
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#3
Snarks, and boojums, come from Lewis Carroll's 'The Hunting of the Snark'
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2014
#50
so, anyone who doesn't declare class war on the upper middle class is a fraud in your estimation nt
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#48
I guess you could have cut a better deal by waving your Internet magic stick
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#97
Sadly, Kraugman has become a full time cheerleader for this administration. Bummer. nt
Demo_Chris
Jan 2014
#32
Ouch! Shoot that messenger! Times are tough when Nobel-prize winning liberal economist has to
pampango
Jan 2014
#39
rule of practice: when one person argues with numbers, and the other responds
geek tragedy
Jan 2014
#47
FDR was a millionaire. It seems possible to be a millionaire and a liberal at the same time. n/t
pampango
Jan 2014
#75
So liberal economists are judged by different rules than liberal politicians. Got it.
pampango
Jan 2014
#78
No, it simply supports my contention that it would have to have roughly doubled. nt
MannyGoldstein
Jan 2014
#57