Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Top 10 Jobs That Might Not Survive the Coming Robot 'Jobocalpyse,' Is Yours on the List? [View all]Xipe Totec
(44,550 posts)1. No jobs = no income = no consumer = no market
So who's gonna purchase all the cheap crap produced by robots?
You don't need babysitters if you're staying at home because you have no job.
You cant buy the produce if you don't have a job.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Top 10 Jobs That Might Not Survive the Coming Robot 'Jobocalpyse,' Is Yours on the List? [View all]
Jesus Malverde
Jan 2014
OP
You'll find a way or we'll send you off to deal with robotic corrections officers...
Jesus Malverde
Jan 2014
#4
You will command an army of robots in the new paradigm, and you will be "a" nurse... times 20.
MADem
Jan 2014
#33
I've got to get busy writing a credit card skimming program for robotic bartenders.
Ikonoklast
Jan 2014
#55
they do know that Daft Punk are not really robots but dudes in costume, right?
NightWatcher
Jan 2014
#21
So a robot with a perfect measured poor that can tell when you've exceeded limit
hughee99
Jan 2014
#12
I have an interest in robotic agriculture. The fact is, Robots can be designed that can detect a
bluestate10
Jan 2014
#37
And when the last job is eliminated and the wealthy are holed away on their islands . . .
HughBeaumont
Jan 2014
#51