I'm not generally in favor of "banning" stuff, but maybe Carl's Jr. went a bit too far (maybe NSFW)

[Feral Child]

129. I haven't a clue what you're talking about.

I didn't "attack" anyone. I agreed with another poster about the fixation of she-you-are-over-eager-to-defend.

Please note that the aggrieved party hasn't responded to my post; apparently, it wasn't as offensive as you'd like to believe.

A quick review of the thread discloses that you did not question the poster I responded to, did not inform her that the post I was agreeing with was ""unwarranted and crude". Interesting. You thought you could pick a fight with the Newbee, but were scared to call out a senior poster. Your reluctance is understandable. Misquoting Shakespeare by paraphrase is the mark of an inferior intellect. It's trite. I suspect Muriel has schooled you sharply in the past and your prose wasn't really up to the challenge.


Perhaps you could define your terms. In what way was my post "crude"? Describe my crudity with specificity, please.

I'll determine what's appropriate for me to post, thank you. I'd suggest you worry about the ethics of making unwarranted and crude accusations against a junior poster.

"Nobody's buying it". You've taken a survey, made a consensus; perhaps posted a poll, and that's why you feel confident in speaking for the entire community. Clearly, you're the spoke-person for DU, since "nobody" else has chosen to support your pillory.

This exchange is a waste of my time. Still, I suppose I can continue to bolster my post count with ripostes to your frantic scrambling to justify your call-out. Tell me, how many posts do you require before you treat a DUer with respect?