Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Edward Snowden [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)44. Do whistle-blowers disrupt your comfortable denial bubble?
Progressives support whistle-blowers, investigative journalists, protestors, Occupy, and others that dare speak out against tyranny. It's the conservatives among us that wallow in the promised safety of our authoritarian leaders. Are you sure your name shouldnt be "Conservative Dog"? Let me help you decide. Conservatives choose Clapper over Snowden.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Snooping when Bush did it = bad. Snooping when Obama continues doing it = good.
Nanjing to Seoul
Jan 2014
#7
And I suppose you cheer American exceptionalism when we stand up against human rights violations
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#38
I am not blaming American exceptionalism on Pres Obama. My point is that those here
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#73
Is that the only thing I posted about that you refute? Are you ok with our steady
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#80
Authoritarian powers can not tolerate whistle-blowers or others that speak truth
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#37
Or the way they treated the Occupy Wall St Protesters?? Or the way they treat Whistle Blowers?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#12
Yep, most media folks would have already gotten a bullet in the head. That's what Russia does to
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#28
That doesnt happen here. They might commit suicide, die in a small plane crash, or their car might
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#76
Don't forget, torture whistle blowers! That's what THEY would do! But not us?
sabrina 1
Jan 2014
#40
Make note of all those whose main responses are to attack the character of the messenger,
snot
Jan 2014
#16
Their seething rage at Snowden, and nary a word about the illegal US activities.
riderinthestorm
Jan 2014
#27
Any illegalities alleged are clearly lies and part of an evil libertarian/Putin-backed/Paulite CT
bobduca
Jan 2014
#71
And what of the GOP controlled NSA? Clapper and Alexander are Republicans. Funny
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#53
Again with the Teabagger bullshit about "The evil dictator Obama"! Get off it, fool!
baldguy
Jan 2014
#60
I think you are way off in your sad attempt to apologize for the President.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#63
As if characterizing reasonable Democrats - including the sitting Democratic President
baldguy
Jan 2014
#64
I dont see any compelling arguments in your post. When stumped you just go to name calling.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#65
Accusing a sitting Democratic President of being a dictator & his supporters of being authoritarians
baldguy
Jan 2014
#68
Funny how you have to lower yourself into putting words into my mouth to be able to
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#70
BULLLLLLLLLLLLLSHHHIITTTT!! Snowden - Public has a right to info but not a right to judge me on law
uponit7771
Jan 2014
#33
and you believe in American exceptionalism. That's not very progressive. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#89
Again you try to put words in my mouth. I have never said the US is a tyranny. I have said
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#103
Let's be clear, you side against whistle-blowers and with lying Republicans like Clapper.
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#46
So you wont deny that you favor Republicans like Clapper over whistle-blowers?
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#49
If you are referring to mimicking corp-media ad hominem attacks, then no. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#90
I side with no national security? That's a lie. You are getting desperate. nm
rhett o rick
Jan 2014
#111
How can there be secrets if any punk in the chain of command can break his oath and tell the secret?
hog
Jan 2014
#55
You are choosing to interpret it that way. That is your opinion and your choice.
stevenleser
Jan 2014
#85