General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Study Details Gun Injuries Suffered by Children [View all]Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)1) Yes, 19 is a child. Perhaps not to 19 year olds themselves, but they're kids.
2) You seem quite ignorant of gang age demographics. One might get the impression you're going off something other than fact - truthiness, perhaps?
3) You seem to be trying to make an argument justifying the shooting of children - or children and 19 year olds, however you want to frame it. Using of course the perennial gun goon fear of "gangs" (which much like "thug" the rest of us fully understand as a racial dog whistle.) Unsurprising, given your committed rallying for George Zimmerman, I suppose.
While I'm glad your sort are being honest about what goes on inside your heads these days, I do wish you would find somewhere else to do it. I'm sure the Heritage Foundation has a discussion area.