Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Single Women Are Quickly Becoming the ‘Evangelicals’ of the Democratic Party [View all]BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)44. Hey jwirr
Actually I was adressing myself to you...but maybe I misunderstood your point.
I replied because the issue isn't specifically OTC birth control...it's prescription B.C. taken out of insurance coverage, so that women have to pay insurance, and pay again for B.C.
My understanding is that OTC B.C. would only be outlawed if Sanctimonius somehow got selected. Anyway, insurance has never covered anything OTC.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Single Women Are Quickly Becoming the ‘Evangelicals’ of the Democratic Party [View all]
one_voice
Mar 2012
OP
It's not lost to me, not when there are 3 million of the most insane attacks on women
Zalatix
Mar 2012
#49
Maybe you don't realize that the Republicans are trying to make birth control illegal again.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#12
Over the counter does not get paid for by most insurance programs. That is the issue as I see it.
jwirr
Mar 2012
#16
Agreed. However I am 70 years old and once they did Medicaid and Medicare did cover OTC item.
jwirr
Mar 2012
#47
Okay I am going to deviate a bit because I supported my wife when she had no job
Zalatix
Mar 2012
#21
I think the ...eligible bachelors... and ....languishing in unemployment... are the controllers in
MADem
Mar 2012
#59
Only two groups, even "roughly"? That is way too over-simplified and doesn't help
spooky3
Mar 2012
#55