Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

okaawhatever

(9,565 posts)
25. Did anyone bother reading the articles? Here's the money shot:
Tue Jan 28, 2014, 12:53 PM
Jan 2014

Lawmakers say the compromise would not force anyone off the food stamp rolls. The budget savings, said Senator Debbie Stabenow, Democrat of Michigan and chairwoman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, would come from changes to the way states administer a federal program that helps low-income families with their heating bills.

Under that program, known as Heat and Eat, the District of Columbia and 15 states, including New York and California, allow people who receive heating assistance subsidies to deduct their utility costs from their incomes, allowing them to claim more food stamp benefits.

Critics of the program say that in many cases states exploit a loophole in the law and help families increase the amount of their benefits by giving them a heating subsidy as little as $1, solely to make them eligible for more food stamps. By barring states from doing so, some families will received less in food stamps, and Congress expects that will reduce the program’s costs by $9 billion over the 10 years.

___________

So basically, 15 states calculate their food stamp program differently from the others. This evens the playing field. I'll bet the Democratic senators who voted no are from states where they calculate it differently.

I do think consideration needs to be given to adjust for areas where cost of living is significantly different. A family of 4 who makes 20k per year has much more money for food if their heat bill is 100 per month vs. 500 per month. That being said, the way it is calculated needs to be consistent across the board. I noticed that California calculates it differently if the person is on heating assistance. I can't imagine that would be much of a change since their heating bills aren't much compared to colder states. New York of course, will feel the pinch much more so.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Because sometimes you have to beachbum bob Jan 2014 #1
So yaaaay! That will make hungry people feel sooooo much better!!!!!!!! djean111 Jan 2014 #3
when Obama compromises.... dennis4868 Jan 2014 #7
You called that right, unfortunately. randome Jan 2014 #13
Why is it that the compromisers are ALWAYS the Democrats? LiberalEsto Jan 2014 #17
The Repukes did compromise. The Democratic controlled Senate approved $4 Billion in cuts. The okaawhatever Jan 2014 #24
Because, perhaps, the whole thing is just a kabuki play. or chess. or some other shit. djean111 Jan 2014 #2
Let me just say ProSense Jan 2014 #5
Oh, I understand the question. djean111 Jan 2014 #6
"Looks to me like progressive have to go along with what are essentially Third Way policies." ProSense Jan 2014 #11
Hey, my choices are that either they had to compromise on hungry people, djean111 Jan 2014 #12
That's easy, they are adults. nt Progressive dog Jan 2014 #4
Maybe all those folks who are calling for them to run in 2016... Walk away Jan 2014 #8
Because no perfect bill has ever been presented for a vote? MineralMan Jan 2014 #9
That's what I am thinking. HappyMe Jan 2014 #10
Me too. Check out who voted against it (from the OP's link) PotatoChip Jan 2014 #14
There's the answer right there. HappyMe Jan 2014 #16
Yeah, and it's interesting the two Democratic Senators from RI voted no. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #18
I lived in RI for about a year HappyMe Jan 2014 #22
Cruz and Cornyn voted against it so it's TBF Jan 2014 #35
most interesting. n/t BlancheSplanchnik Jan 2014 #38
Bookmarking for future reference. JNelson6563 Jan 2014 #15
They had boxes in their garage and their abandoned girlfriends are pole dancers? nt bemildred Jan 2014 #19
Or maybe they're Paulite racists. ProSense Jan 2014 #20
Exactly. Must be something like that. nt bemildred Jan 2014 #23
Maybe Putin made them do it. JoePhilly Jan 2014 #21
LOL! n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #27
I hear he has remote nipples that spy all over America. n/t Whisp Jan 2014 #29
Did anyone bother reading the articles? Here's the money shot: okaawhatever Jan 2014 #25
Because we stupidly allow all sorts of irrelevant bad stuff to get tacked onto good bills Lydia Leftcoast Jan 2014 #26
Kick...nt SidDithers Jan 2014 #28
Interesting. nt Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 #30
How would you have voted? Union Scribe Jan 2014 #31
You first. n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #32
... Rex Jan 2014 #33
;) adirondacker Jan 2014 #39
Why can't you ever give a straight answer? nt Union Scribe Jan 2014 #36
Why ProSense Jan 2014 #37
They certainly are earning our votes. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senators Sanders and Warr...»Reply #25