Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Self-defense: Duty to retreat or Stand your ground [View all]Are_grits_groceries
(17,139 posts)30. It expands the doctrine of Castle Law.
Castle Law
Based on the English Common Law provision that one's home is one's "castle", the Castle Doctrine is a popular yet controversial law that allows for a person whose home is under attack to use force upon the attacker.
As each state has its own Castle laws (just like the 3 strike law), there are a number of limitations and exclusions to the law. Generally speaking, though, the occupant:
must believe that the intruder intends to do serious harm
must believe that the intruder intends to commit a felony
must not have provoked the intruder or threat of harm
may be protecting himself or any other within the residence
may need to announce his presence and intention to retaliate
In all cases, the occupant must legally be in the residence, and the intruder must be there illegally. Additionally, Castle laws may extend these rights to a workplace, car, or other residence where the occupant is legally.
In some states, the Castle Doctrine provides complete immunity, including from future civil suits brought forth by the intruder and/or the intruder's family.
<snip>
More info: http://www.totalcriminaldefense.com/overview/castle-doctrine.aspx
All of the states define Castle Law, Stand Your Ground,and Duty to Retreat differently.
In some cases, SYG has been interpreted very broadly. It as been used successfully in court for cases that do not involve a residence.
What happens to someone involved in a self-defense situation will depend on the state, the instructions from the judge, and how the law is interpreted.

Based on the English Common Law provision that one's home is one's "castle", the Castle Doctrine is a popular yet controversial law that allows for a person whose home is under attack to use force upon the attacker.
As each state has its own Castle laws (just like the 3 strike law), there are a number of limitations and exclusions to the law. Generally speaking, though, the occupant:
must believe that the intruder intends to do serious harm
must believe that the intruder intends to commit a felony
must not have provoked the intruder or threat of harm
may be protecting himself or any other within the residence
may need to announce his presence and intention to retaliate
In all cases, the occupant must legally be in the residence, and the intruder must be there illegally. Additionally, Castle laws may extend these rights to a workplace, car, or other residence where the occupant is legally.
In some states, the Castle Doctrine provides complete immunity, including from future civil suits brought forth by the intruder and/or the intruder's family.
<snip>
More info: http://www.totalcriminaldefense.com/overview/castle-doctrine.aspx
All of the states define Castle Law, Stand Your Ground,and Duty to Retreat differently.
In some cases, SYG has been interpreted very broadly. It as been used successfully in court for cases that do not involve a residence.
What happens to someone involved in a self-defense situation will depend on the state, the instructions from the judge, and how the law is interpreted.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
perhaps you would not "chase or shoot him" - that does not hold true for everyone else with a gun
DrDan
Mar 2012
#54
"standing one's ground" generally refers to someone in their home or other place they have a right
Romulox
Mar 2012
#8
Having a gun isn't a required precondition for self defense. At any rate, *you* posted the article,
Romulox
Mar 2012
#20
The 911 call that Zimmerman himself made is evidence that he chased Martin. He admits it.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#31
I hope the police can use cell phone positioning data to determine Zimmerman's
JoePhilly
Mar 2012
#16
When conservative controlled governments put weapons in the hands of unstable violent morons....
Evasporque
Mar 2012
#23
Common sense is also rare against among anti-gun people. I have seen both over react.
Logical
Mar 2012
#45
Except that the Sanford police have been caught in several lies about this so far.
yardwork
Mar 2012
#37
While I think this POS's actions fail to even meet the meager Stand Your Ground requirements...
Tommy_Carcetti
Mar 2012
#48