Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Jenoch

(7,720 posts)

17. For what?

Reply to X_Digger (Reply #16)

Thu Jan 30, 2014, 01:53 AM

Jan 2014

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Police Will Soon Be Able To Test DNA In The Field In Just 90 Minutes [View all] FarCenter Jan 2014 OP

Next up Politicalboi Jan 2014 #1

That sounds like a HIPAA violation. BadgerKid Jan 2014 #5

DNA will be tied to flying... TeeYiYi Jan 2014 #27

Tattooed barcodes on the forehead and RFID chip implants are just around the corner. democratisphere Jan 2014 #2

They better have a good reason to collect and test DNA. Jenoch Jan 2014 #3

"Probable cause" pretty much went out the door with the drug laws. hobbit709 Jan 2014 #6

Why? JJChambers Jan 2014 #8

Are you serious? Jenoch Jan 2014 #10

Really? JJChambers Jan 2014 #11

Your last point is a straw man argument. Jenoch Jan 2014 #12

Here you go JJChambers Jan 2014 #13

In parts of England they have taken, by force, Jenoch Jan 2014 #14

There is no higher standard for a search than probable cause. X_Digger Jan 2014 #16

For what? Jenoch Jan 2014 #17

You said.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #18

Probable cause is not enough to Jenoch Jan 2014 #19

I don't think you understand what probable cause is. X_Digger Jan 2014 #22

If azcop pulls somebody over Jenoch Jan 2014 #25

You still haven't said what standard you think *is* appropriate. X_Digger Jan 2014 #26

You seem to be confused. Jenoch Jan 2014 #28

Probable cause is required for both. The same exact standard. X_Digger Jan 2014 #29

You are confused. Jenoch Jan 2014 #30

What does it take to get a court order? PROBABLE CAUSE. *sigh* X_Digger Jan 2014 #32

Probable cause is what allows a cop to Jenoch Jan 2014 #35

A cop can pull you over based on multiple standards. X_Digger Jan 2014 #36

I don't disagree with anything in this post of yours. Jenoch Jan 2014 #37

Because you don't seem to understand that a court order requires the same PROBABLE CAUSE.. X_Digger Jan 2014 #38

Will you let it go? Jenoch Jan 2014 #39

Silly JJChambers Jan 2014 #33

Lrobable cause is the standard to go to court Jenoch Jan 2014 #34

Oh man. linuxman Jan 2014 #4

A free Judge Dread with every testing kit seveneyes Jan 2014 #7

Next step: a judge via Skype and a Twitter-style jury Earth_First Jan 2014 #9

I wonder when they'll start using 90 minute DNA tests to possibly exonerate innocent prison inmates ck4829 Jan 2014 #15

I don't have a problem taking DNA from a bona fide suspect with a court order. Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2014 #20

So, NOW can they test all of the rape kits waiting for testing? n/t factsarenotfair Jan 2014 #21

Anyone attentive to the Snowden/NSA revelations closeupready Jan 2014 #23

What could possibly go wrong with that? Fumesucker Jan 2014 #24

Expect warrantless DNA tests at random checkpoints Taitertots Jan 2014 #31