Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: About those 400 defrocked pedophile priests: Where are they now? [View all]Xithras
(16,191 posts)6. It's not even that.
A large portion of the priests had sex with a teenager 16 or older which is statutory rape.
In most of the U.S., having sex with a 16 year old isn't even a prosecutable crime. In states where it is statutory rape, or where special exemptions in the law exist to prosecute those in power positions who engage in them, the statutes of limitations are very short.
Here in California, for example, child molestation has a statute of limitations that basically boils down to "8 years after it's reported to the police". If a child is molested at 10, and doesn't report it until they're 30, the abuser can be prosecuted until the victim is 38.
With statutory rape in the same state, the statute of limitations is 1 year for misdemeanor "touching", or a maximum of 3 years for actual copulation or penetration. If a 30 year old sleeps with a 17 year old, and the 17 year old doesn't report it for 5 years, the older person gets away with it.
Many of these priests are being defrocked for crimes that happened decades ago. In most of these cases, the option of prosecuting doesn't exist any longer.
In most of the U.S., having sex with a 16 year old isn't even a prosecutable crime. In states where it is statutory rape, or where special exemptions in the law exist to prosecute those in power positions who engage in them, the statutes of limitations are very short.
Here in California, for example, child molestation has a statute of limitations that basically boils down to "8 years after it's reported to the police". If a child is molested at 10, and doesn't report it until they're 30, the abuser can be prosecuted until the victim is 38.
With statutory rape in the same state, the statute of limitations is 1 year for misdemeanor "touching", or a maximum of 3 years for actual copulation or penetration. If a 30 year old sleeps with a 17 year old, and the 17 year old doesn't report it for 5 years, the older person gets away with it.
Many of these priests are being defrocked for crimes that happened decades ago. In most of these cases, the option of prosecuting doesn't exist any longer.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
oh... They may or may not get convicted but it's still miles better then letting them go free
Ohio Joe
Jan 2014
#7
So you like to put words in people's mouths & be outraged at what you stuffed in there?
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#16
I don't engage in discussion with people who put words in other people's mouths. It's a fruitless
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#30
Are you aware of the the tactics the Church used to discourage survivors from prosecuting?
AngryOldDem
Jan 2014
#45
No it's not baloney. Database of Publicly Accused Priests in the United States
Ellipsis
Jan 2014
#19
Anyone who claims that 1/4 of priests are raping children is dispensing baloney.
El_Johns
Jan 2014
#21
yada yada yada ... round and round you go, twisty, turney we've been down this road before.
Ellipsis
Jan 2014
#28
I kinda think you are when it comes to the pope...like I said before, your premise is skewed.
Ellipsis
Jan 2014
#31
Here's your link *smooch* yada yada yada incorrect sensationalized premise once again.
Ellipsis
Jan 2014
#34
pffft... A story about the church protecting a pedophile is proof they are not... heh
Ohio Joe
Jan 2014
#36
*They are working together* *There has been no request for extradition* You win
Ellipsis
Jan 2014
#37