Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
6. It's not even that.
Thu Jan 30, 2014, 09:01 PM
Jan 2014
A large portion of the priests had sex with a teenager 16 or older which is statutory rape.

In most of the U.S., having sex with a 16 year old isn't even a prosecutable crime. In states where it is statutory rape, or where special exemptions in the law exist to prosecute those in power positions who engage in them, the statutes of limitations are very short.

Here in California, for example, child molestation has a statute of limitations that basically boils down to "8 years after it's reported to the police". If a child is molested at 10, and doesn't report it until they're 30, the abuser can be prosecuted until the victim is 38.

With statutory rape in the same state, the statute of limitations is 1 year for misdemeanor "touching", or a maximum of 3 years for actual copulation or penetration. If a 30 year old sleeps with a 17 year old, and the 17 year old doesn't report it for 5 years, the older person gets away with it.

Many of these priests are being defrocked for crimes that happened decades ago. In most of these cases, the option of prosecuting doesn't exist any longer.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There are not 400 pedophile preists gerogie2 Jan 2014 #1
So if the church handed over the evidence, the police would not pursue it? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #2
Yes. gerogie2 Jan 2014 #5
oh... They may or may not get convicted but it's still miles better then letting them go free Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #7
Ity is not my position gerogie2 Jan 2014 #8
So you defend the church protecting these monsters? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #9
So you like to put words in people's mouths & be outraged at what you stuffed in there? El_Johns Jan 2014 #16
Well... Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #18
Stuff it in stuff it in El_Johns Jan 2014 #25
Don't want to give your opinion? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #27
I don't engage in discussion with people who put words in other people's mouths. It's a fruitless El_Johns Jan 2014 #30
Kind of like supprting a pope who protects pedophiles? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #32
Are you aware of the the tactics the Church used to discourage survivors from prosecuting? AngryOldDem Jan 2014 #45
The police would try to interview the victim gerogie2 Jan 2014 #11
So it's no use... Give them all a pass... Let them hide Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #12
Then I suggest gerogie2 Jan 2014 #13
Yes, because without victim testimony, they throw out all cases Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #14
CBS news disagrees with you. They report : Bluenorthwest Jan 2014 #3
Parents of young boys are often ashamed into silence by the Bishop warrant46 Jan 2014 #4
It's not even that. Xithras Jan 2014 #6
ok, fuck-o, let me tell you about the priest who raped me AngryAmish Jan 2014 #24
Per the church, you (and perhaps Satan?) seduced that innocent priest.... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #44
According to the church there were THOUSANDS in America alone... Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #10
Oh,baloney. El_Johns Jan 2014 #17
No it's not baloney. Database of Publicly Accused Priests in the United States Ellipsis Jan 2014 #19
Anyone who claims that 1/4 of priests are raping children is dispensing baloney. El_Johns Jan 2014 #21
Look at the database... Ellipsis Jan 2014 #23
seems about right AngryAmish Jan 2014 #26
k&r n/t RainDog Jan 2014 #15
..."but they refuse to hand it over to the police so they can be prosecuted." Ellipsis Jan 2014 #20
They have handed over all their information to police? Got a link for that? Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #22
yada yada yada ... round and round you go, twisty, turney we've been down this road before. Ellipsis Jan 2014 #28
So... You are just making a cliam without any evidence... A shock Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #29
I kinda think you are when it comes to the pope...like I said before, your premise is skewed. Ellipsis Jan 2014 #31
The shit bag protects pedophiles... It is a simple fact Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #33
Here's your link *smooch* yada yada yada incorrect sensationalized premise once again. Ellipsis Jan 2014 #34
pffft... A story about the church protecting a pedophile is proof they are not... heh Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #36
*They are working together* *There has been no request for extradition* You win Ellipsis Jan 2014 #37
Yeah... Working together... They pulled his ass out instead of turning over what they knew Ohio Joe Jan 2014 #38
they remind me of Zimmerman apologists Skittles Jan 2014 #40
Scheduling Skittles for a christian pretzel making session Ellipsis Jan 2014 #41
OMG Skittles Jan 2014 #42
OK. G'night Ellipsis Jan 2014 #43
Ask Pope Ratzenberg. Walk away Jan 2014 #35
Oliver O'Grady is now in Limerick, Ireland. mackerel Jan 2014 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About those 400 defrocked...»Reply #6