Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

linuxman

(2,337 posts)

7. I disagree.

Reply to morningfog (Reply #4)

Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:26 AM

Jan 2014

"Beyond all REASONABLE doubt" is the standard for a reason.

Beyond ALL doubt is an impossible standard to follow. Followed to the letter, nobody would be convicted of anything. Ever. Even the most seemingly airtight case would result in an acquittal every time.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Lawyer will fight for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev' life [View all] morningfog Jan 2014 OP

Sorry I have no problem with the death penalty in this case. SCUBANOW Jan 2014 #1

The only two problems with the DP JJChambers Jan 2014 #2

There is almost never indisputable evidence. morningfog Jan 2014 #4

I disagree JJChambers Jan 2014 #5

DNA and/or video evidence is almost never indisputable. morningfog Jan 2014 #6

I think you're stretching JJChambers Jan 2014 #12

I disagree. linuxman Jan 2014 #7

I have a problem with DP in EVERY case, but especially morningfog Jan 2014 #3

As his lawyer should fight for his life davidpdx Jan 2014 #8

They will never get the Death Sentence ... Walk away Jan 2014 #9

Isn't this what any attorney should do for their client? Arkansas Granny Jan 2014 #10

Good. That's his job, and he should do it to the best of his ability. Iggo Jan 2014 #11