Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

El_Johns

(1,805 posts)
49. They spend more on advertising by a long shot.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 02:01 PM
Jan 2014

Big Pharma might be working a lot harder to sell you products than to develop new ones.

Prescription drug companies aren't putting a lot of resources toward new, groundbreaking medication, according to a recent report in BMJ, a medical journal based in London. Instead, it's more profitable for them to simply to create a bunch of products that are only slightly different from drugs already on the market, the reports authors said.

"Pharmaceutical research and development turns out mostly minor variations on existing drugs," the authors write. "Sales from these drugs generate steady profits throughout the ups and downs of blockbusters coming off patents."

The authors go on to say that for every dollar pharmaceutical companies spend on "basic research," $19 goes toward promotion and marketing.

The BMJ study isn't the first time pharmaceutical companies have been accused of putting their own profits ahead of the health of their customers. Lexchin, a professor at York University's School of Health Policy and Management, was the co-author of another study in 2008 that argued that pharmaceutical companies spend almost twice as much on promotion as they do on research and development.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/09/pharmaceutical-companies-marketing_n_1760380.html


Government does most of the basic R&D for pharma.


Industry R&D risks and costs are often significantly reduced by taxpayer-funded research, which has helped launch the most medically important drugs in recent years and many of the best-selling drugs, including all of the top five sellers in one recent year surveyed (1995).

An internal National Institutes of Health (NIH) document, obtained by Public Citizen through the Freedom of Information Act, shows how crucial taxpayer-funded research is to top-selling drugs. According to the NIH, taxpayer-funded scientists conducted 55 percent of the research projects that led to the discovery and development of the top five selling drugs in 1995. (See Section III)

https://www.citizen.org/publications/release.cfm?ID=7065



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Recommend...it sounds like Pharma gone Wild... KoKo Jan 2014 #1
Yes, well, they need the money to pay the executives siligut Jan 2014 #2
that is utterly obscene.... mike_c Jan 2014 #3
There is a hep C treatment vaccine in the works now . . . siligut Jan 2014 #7
Keep in mind this tidbit: their salaries are tax deductable Nictuku Jan 2014 #9
GILD doesn't pay dividends, but they are 99% owned by institutions siligut Jan 2014 #16
What do you mean by institutions? El_Johns Jan 2014 #51
Mutual Funds, Money Management Companies, Trusts siligut Jan 2014 #53
Thanks. Another question: Is there a site where one can see the top investors in Gilead? El_Johns Jan 2014 #56
I use Yahoo Finance quite often, here is a link siligut Jan 2014 #58
Thanks again. Very helpful, already I find that Gilead's 2nd-largest holder, FMC LLC is controlled El_Johns Jan 2014 #59
R & D IS Expensive, but eepatt Jan 2014 #11
Most of pharmas research arikara Jan 2014 #22
Most pharmaceutical R&D is paid for by the U.S. taxpayers TransitJohn Jan 2014 #36
Those ads are playing constantly AllyCat Jan 2014 #43
They spend more on advertising by a long shot. El_Johns Jan 2014 #49
It is pure greed and it is very wrong but.... proudretiredvet Jan 2014 #37
Government does the majority of basic R&D for big pharma. El_Johns Jan 2014 #50
OK, the top 5 selling drugs. proudretiredvet Feb 2014 #60
Disgusting and obscene! SammyWinstonJack Feb 2014 #68
holding the ill hostage....criminal spanone Jan 2014 #4
very important story frwrfpos Jan 2014 #5
Bloodsuckers. johnnyreb Jan 2014 #6
"Get a rope!" another_liberal Jan 2014 #8
gouging of course, but percentages are deceptive whatthehey Jan 2014 #10
They grossly overpaid for the Pharmasset and now want to hold the sick hostage for their greed kristopher Jan 2014 #18
I hope this one gets "World Wide Coverage"..everywhere Stuart G Jan 2014 #12
Indian pharmacies JackHughes Jan 2014 #13
There's also hardly any innovation in Indian Pharmacies either. NobodyHere Jan 2014 #38
k & r! n/t wildbilln864 Jan 2014 #14
Unconscionable Brainstormy Jan 2014 #15
Those behind this sort of maneuver sulphurdunn Jan 2014 #17
It's like a funeral home gouging and then saying, "Didn't you love your mom?" Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #19
I recently had retinal surgery tavernier Jan 2014 #20
Capitalism at its zenith: f*ck over the public free of governmental oversight, regulation, or indepat Jan 2014 #21
+1 a shit load! Enthusiast Jan 2014 #25
people will die due to no access SHRED Jan 2014 #23
Capitalism in action frwrfpos Jan 2014 #24
"There are alternative (and less expensive) treatments for Hepatitis C already available." Hoyt Jan 2014 #26
The other treatment for HCV... SHRED Jan 2014 #28
If true, that certainly changes things. Hoyt Jan 2014 #31
It is true and easy to verify online SHRED Jan 2014 #34
Does it change things 300,000%? El_Johns Jan 2014 #52
Aside from obscene profits and medicaid... Chakaconcarne Jan 2014 #27
My eye drops are $28,000 per liter. Manifestor_of_Light Jan 2014 #29
"Your money or your life" standard blackmail. SunSeeker Jan 2014 #30
Makes ya wonder how these big pharma assholes sleep at night Submariner Jan 2014 #32
This is very typical $ for rheumatoid arthritis, and that will kill you just as dead. jtuck004 Jan 2014 #33
And no Single Payer. Just shitty RomneyCare leftovers. Thanks for fighting for us, BHO. blkmusclmachine Jan 2014 #35
Doesn't "Gilead Sciences" sound like one of those evil Robocop-type future corporations? El_Johns Jan 2014 #39
Totally does ... in the movie, the nefarious CEO would be played by James Cromwell brett_jv Jan 2014 #42
Big Pharma = criminal enterprises! LuckyLib Jan 2014 #40
My daughter was taking Soliris Bombero1956 Jan 2014 #41
$10,000.00 for pre-chemo shot. JNelson6563 Jan 2014 #44
Gilead. Rumsfeld used to be its chairman, so, of course, Gilead are thieves and own a piece of valerief Jan 2014 #45
That is not the only one. unionguy Jan 2014 #46
They are an actual ship full of cannibal rats. hunter Jan 2014 #47
My daughter's treatment for porphyria was $4000 each. freebrew Jan 2014 #48
Attacking big pharma and health "care" delivery costs!? That's just... "woo!" villager Jan 2014 #54
No it isn't, learn the meaning of the word "woo" before you post further, Humanist_Activist Feb 2014 #61
alas, the embarassment is all yours villager Feb 2014 #62
OK, then explain to me how being concerned with rising costs of health care... Humanist_Activist Feb 2014 #66
Ha, Ha, Ha fascisthunter Feb 2014 #65
What I find amazing is that people complain about the costs of prescription drugs... Humanist_Activist Feb 2014 #67
oh...who does that? Are we off topic? fascisthunter Feb 2014 #70
What is the Non-Recurring Engineering Cost per pill? One_Life_To_Give Jan 2014 #55
beyond obscene niyad Jan 2014 #57
Preditory capitalizm at its best. Sick greedy asshole sociopaths! L0oniX Feb 2014 #63
That's enough to make me stop complaining about my glucose test strips n/t IDemo Feb 2014 #64
This is a perfect example of ProSense Feb 2014 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A markup of 279,000% over...»Reply #49