Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hey! Why the f*ck are we blowing up our soldiers up in Afghanistan? Anyone got a logical reason? [View all]grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)35. Unfortunately it looks to me like the continued war is a crime by international standards, and
as commander in chief he could simply order a withdrawal.
A crime against peace, in international law, refers to "planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing" - Nicolas Werth, Karel Bartoek, Jean-Louis Panné, Jean-Louis Margolin, Andrzej Paczkowski, Stéphane Courtois, The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, 1999, hardcover, 858 pages, ISBN 0-674-07608-7, page 5.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hey! Why the f*ck are we blowing up our soldiers up in Afghanistan? Anyone got a logical reason? [View all]
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
OP
Because the corporations need to profit from military contracts and what better way
Lint Head
Jan 2014
#1
All Presidents are captive to corporate global financies. Not that they're 'not' responsible for
Lint Head
Jan 2014
#15
Unfortunately it looks to me like the continued war is a crime by international standards, and
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#35
In and out would be the correct "simple" plan. But things are not that simple and
Lint Head
Jan 2014
#56
I don't actually agree with Will on this one, but the pack of jackals attacking him is inexcusable.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jan 2014
#27
I'll take that as a no. No reason. Sensless. Irrational. War. Or war for profit.
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#11
“The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who in time of moral crisis, do nothing" - JFK
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#61
Pakistan (nukes). I doubt we're terribly concerned with actual Afghanistan now.
TwilightGardener
Jan 2014
#9
They need to be there so the Afghans get training so they can leave or something.
Octafish
Jan 2014
#16
It's so disturbing when you cut to the core argument and they have no answer:(
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#40
Oh right, the monkey bars, lol. And remember the pen guns, and terrorist dressed up as Santa and
grahamhgreen
Jan 2014
#42
pakistan pakistan pakistan. also georgee took the forces we needed to iwaq + left the rest to play
pansypoo53219
Jan 2014
#25
I don't know about the logic of it but it helps the MIC maintain their lifestyle.
jwirr
Jan 2014
#29
Watch "Dirty Wars" There is no good reason to be over there. It's a crime against humanity.
L0oniX
Jan 2014
#60