General Discussion

randome

(34,845 posts)

5. Apparently so. That isn't the point.

Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:58 AM

Feb 2014

As easy as it was for Snowden to steal classified documents, how much LESS secure do you think a corporate media organization is?

You may be able to find a handful of DUers who want to put a bullet in Snowden's empty head, but that's about it. And that's the unneeded hyperbole I referred to.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Birds are territorial creatures.
The lyrics to the songbird's melodious trill go something like this:
"Stay out of my territory or I'll PECK YOUR GODDAMNED EYES OUT!"[/center][/font][hr]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Video of GCHQ ordering the Guardian to destroy laptops. [View all] Savannahmann Feb 2014 OP

Damn. There is that "850,000 Americans" number again. bemildred Feb 2014 #1

Good God, the hyperbole knows no bounds. randome Feb 2014 #2

So did this government-ordered destruction not occur? Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #3

Apparently so. That isn't the point. randome Feb 2014 #5

I would find it hard to believe a U.S. agency would oversee destruction Eleanors38 Feb 2014 #6

Actually, it's been orchestrated by others for some months now. randome Feb 2014 #7

No, you're wrong. The "poorly redacted document" story you mention has been debunked riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #9

Just stating what I read before. randome Feb 2014 #10

Seeing as you posted on BOTH previous threads where this was debunked, you do know riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #11

No, accurate. Savannahmann Feb 2014 #8

This message was self-deleted by its author bemildred Feb 2014 #4