Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama Lies to Jake Tapper About His Ability to Reschedule Marijuana [View all]RainDog
(28,784 posts)65. as your link notes
Cannabis could be rescheduled either legislatively, through Congress, or through the executive branch. Congress has so far rejected all bills to reschedule cannabis. However, it is not unheard of for Congress to intervene in the drug scheduling process; in February 2000, for instance, the 105th Congress, in its second official session, passed Public Law 106-172, also known as the Hillory J. Farias and Samantha Reed Date-Rape Drug Prohibition Act of 2000,[14] adding GHB to Schedule I.[15] On June 23, 2011, Rep. Barney Frank and Rep. Ron Paul introduced H.R. 2306,[16] legislation that would completely remove cannabis from the federal schedules, limiting the federal government's role to policing cross-border or interstate transfers into states where it remains illegal.
The Controlled Substances Act also provides for a rulemaking process by which the United States Attorney General can reschedule cannabis administratively. These proceedings represent the only means of legalizing medical cannabis without an act of Congress. Rescheduling supporters have often cited the lengthy petition review process as a reason why cannabis is still illegal.[3] The first petition took 22 years to review, the second took 7 years, the third was denied 9 years later. A 2013 petition by two state governors is still pending.
The Controlled Substances Act also provides for a rulemaking process by which the United States Attorney General can reschedule cannabis administratively. These proceedings represent the only means of legalizing medical cannabis without an act of Congress. Rescheduling supporters have often cited the lengthy petition review process as a reason why cannabis is still illegal.[3] The first petition took 22 years to review, the second took 7 years, the third was denied 9 years later. A 2013 petition by two state governors is still pending.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama Lies to Jake Tapper About His Ability to Reschedule Marijuana [View all]
TalkingDog
Jan 2014
OP
The author's choice. He's been in office for 5+ years, the MJ debate has been going on most of that
TalkingDog
Jan 2014
#2
He is a constitutional scholar and historian. I am pretty sure he knows he can use a EO
Doctor_J
Feb 2014
#66
Well, first of all, what is and isn’t a Schedule One narcotic is a job for Congress.
Luminous Animal
Jan 2014
#18
So.... he's telling lies because he's got a lot on his plate? And that makes it okay.
TalkingDog
Jan 2014
#9
Agreed. Plus, while the question was specific about changing it from a class I drug, Obama was
okaawhatever
Jan 2014
#11
See how evil drugs are? Obama's not even smoking pot and it's making him say stuff that's not true
Fumesucker
Jan 2014
#6
I guess eventually they will have to go arrest the state of Washington and Colorado.
Rex
Jan 2014
#15
Can you cite a treaty that requires cannabis to be Schedule One? If not, you have no
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2014
#38
from your link,it is obama stopping the change other nation are asking for
questionseverything
Feb 2014
#57
I would explain to you how you're completely wrong, but 1Strong already did so
alcibiades_mystery
Feb 2014
#22
Nuance will be lost on many here, I'm afraid. But thanks for doing the research.
randome
Feb 2014
#34
It's time to walk away from the global drug treaties. They are toothless, anyway.
Comrade Grumpy
Feb 2014
#49
"[EO]...implements or interprets a federal statute, a constitutional provision, or a treaty."
Cerridwen
Feb 2014
#39
If it's for Congress, why has the DEA considered three separate rescheduling petitions?
Comrade Grumpy
Feb 2014
#48
not relying on any after election promises. And I find it offensive when politicians wait on taking
liberal_at_heart
Feb 2014
#71