General Discussion

treestar

(82,383 posts)

241. Especially Warren, you should throw her under the bus

Sun Feb 2, 2014, 02:35 PM

Feb 2014

for belonging to that terrible party and even getting elected to an office within it!

How is she dictator of that party? If so, why can't she force its other members to think as she does?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

372 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Greenwald: Obama "excellent at finding excuses not to prosecute the most powerful" [View all] Exciting Trip Jan 2014 OP

Fuck greenwald. Cha Jan 2014 #1

I don't care if it was Hitler saying it dsc Jan 2014 #2

You are, of course, 100% correct. Shemp Howard Feb 2014 #9

NO he didn't....if he did the REPUBLICAN Congress would be all up in his shit... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #60

Did it ever occur to you that maybe Aerows Feb 2014 #75

but they aren't.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #77

Warren and Sanders are such horrible people Aerows Feb 2014 #78

they are? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #162

Where is this bus? Aerows Feb 2014 #193

NO its the ones that the "purists" throw everyone else under.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #207

They must be, as they serve in Congress treestar Feb 2014 #223

Oh, well Aerows Feb 2014 #236

Especially Warren, you should throw her under the bus treestar Feb 2014 #241

Oh, I'm sorry Aerows Feb 2014 #256

who you calling pure? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #333

Take it up with Treestar. Aerows Feb 2014 #336

and I asked why you "expounded" on it... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #338

Because it was relevant to the conversation Aerows Feb 2014 #340

So because the Republicans are upset, therefore he didnt lie. Is that your argument? rhett o rick Feb 2014 #99

As long as it is official the Obama Administration kept Aerows Feb 2014 #101

So the big question is why did he keep two of Bush's authoritarian Republicans? rhett o rick Feb 2014 #217

Either/or Aerows Feb 2014 #345

I heard it and I also know that when you work in the field he does... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #169

So you forgive his obvious lie because why? The question was simple and yet he lied. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #179

there wasn't a lie...that was my point... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #208

Your argument is very limited. How do you come to the conclusion that he didnt rhett o rick Feb 2014 #211

limited because I do not believe we live in a Black and White world like you? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #212

So you wont tell us why you think he didnt lie? You must have a good rhett o rick Feb 2014 #220

AND that has been explained to you multiple times...IF it was such a bald faced lie VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #224

That is a logical fallacy. Just because he hasnt been prosecuted doesnt rhett o rick Feb 2014 #227

I know how you LOVE to use that phrase but... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #230

Thanks for the link which finished with, ""Perjury is a serious crime. Mr. Clapper should resign rhett o rick Feb 2014 #243

and it is not being prosecuted for it....but YOU deem him guilty without a trial... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #244

I trust a Democratic Senator over a Republican General. How about you? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #228

Do you trust Rand Paul and Darryl Issa? Because they both agree with YOU! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #232

I trust a Democratic Senator over a Republican General. nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #240

and I trust President Obama over Rand Paul, Darryl Issa and Jim Sensenbrenner.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #242

Do you really believe the stupid accusations you make fascisthunter Feb 2014 #257

Do I believe that there are those in this conversation that agree with the positions of VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #262

you trust your beloved President over anyone. You don't seem to grasp that cali Feb 2014 #276

I trust HIM over the words of that bunch... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #277

Please stop! That's a disinformation tactic and you know it... truth2power Feb 2014 #355

your world is incredibly binary: Anything Obama does or says: Good, great, must be cali Feb 2014 #271

Mostly I do yes....You have a problem with Democrats supporting the Democratic President? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #274

YOU have a huge problem with liberal dem politicians who don't support the President on cali Feb 2014 #278

Liberal Democrats no....no I don't VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #283

lol. still trying the childish, inance and transparent attempt at linking cali Feb 2014 #280

No I try the truth... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #284

"and are you threatening me?" SMC22307 Feb 2014 #314

You made the statement...I was just asking...sounded like a veiled one to me... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #316

I can almost see the spittle flying. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #319

Oh yes...here comes chapter 7 in the manual VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #322

You're doing a good job of that on your own. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #326

and yet....here you are... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #327

I only care that two pot states are fielding teams. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #334

Better than that false concern about my health I got.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #339

I don't speak for that poster. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #343

So you would rather have someone falsely ask about your health? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #344

I couldn't care less who asks me what on an "anonymous" message board. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #346

hmmmm I don't think soo.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #348

lol. you think you can debate? at all? too funny, vanilla cali Feb 2014 #363

please post anything I wrote to you that can be construed in any way as a threat. cali Feb 2014 #362

there are some "rightwing Repukes" that DO agree with YOU on this matter... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #285

I've noticed three or four posters - all with the same avatar Fawke Em Feb 2014 #357

He lied, period. And what is a Bush loyalist and appointee doing in a Democratic (note the spelling) sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #182

NOT Period...just like I said IF it was sooooo "period" he would have been charged...by the VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #209

Yes, it's been "period" since it happened for anyone who isn't an idiot or a shill. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2014 #353

So are you calling me an idiot or a shill? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #356

What do you think, VR? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2014 #359

I don't know...you are the one accusating! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #360

I'm accusating? You know the George W Bush glossary is supposed to be humorous, right? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2014 #361

LOL! cui bono Aug 2014 #372

God forbid he piss off the Republicans Doctor_J Feb 2014 #159

I don't need your approval at all.....the President agrees with me... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #245

This is the second time I've seen you use that laughably stupid, circular excuse. Marr Feb 2014 #165

You think they wouldn't toss him overboard to smear Obama? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #210

Did they? Marr Feb 2014 #213

NO THAT you are right about....this ISN'T complex... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #214

He lied, period. Marr Feb 2014 #216

No he didn't but Darryl Issa, Rand Paul and Jim Sennsenbrenner all agree with you... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #237

Again, why are you so doggedly defending this Republican liar? Marr Feb 2014 #270

for the same reason President Obama did...see my previous post... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #272

Please-- let me help you. I want you to stop making a fool of yourself. Marr Feb 2014 #275

You are asking a dogged apologist for the NSA. Aerows Feb 2014 #303

Clapper believes WMDs were shipped from Iraq to Syria before the war. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #235

And President Obama says of the incident... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #239

Yes, let's! SMC22307 Feb 2014 #253

Well we know of at least one such instance don't we? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #255

"Democrat" Party? SMC22307 Feb 2014 #258

a freaking typo...that's the best you got? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #260

LOL SMC22307 Feb 2014 #267

No kidding. Marr Feb 2014 #273

It's reached the cat playing with a half-dead mouse stage. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #282

of course he lied to Congress-- that is not in question.... mike_c Feb 2014 #332

Bullshit!.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #57

Robert Litt is general counsel to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence nt G_j Feb 2014 #87

You dont mean to suggest he might have a bias? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #95

I agree that it's bullshit. Let's take a look at it. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #89

Lets take a look at who DOES agree with you... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #263

completely irrelevant and you (should) know that G_j Feb 2014 #294

I don't find it irrelevant....if those guys agree with you... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #295

talk about bullshit. G_j Feb 2014 #301

Bullshit only because Rand Paul, Darryl Issa and Jim Sensenbrenner agreeing with you VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #302

yea, and I bet they think water is wet too, G_j Feb 2014 #308

So I guess you agree then... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #310

I don't know what they think G_j Feb 2014 #312

I do...I posted what THEY think earlier in this conversation that you thought you just had to add VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #313

then please explain in a comprehensible manner, why their G_j Feb 2014 #331

OMG - the clock was right twice in one day! Aerows Feb 2014 #318

whatever gets you through the night... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #320

I'll just make sure to note Aerows Feb 2014 #323

only thing I used my fingers for so far today is eating and typing... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #324

Well, I wasn't planning on sharing, but Aerows Feb 2014 #325

He was provided the questions in ADVANCE dsc Feb 2014 #92

He was provided the question in advance, the question was straight forward and easy to rhett o rick Feb 2014 #94

I had forgotten the second time dsc Feb 2014 #96

and he THOUGHt he was being asked a question about National Security in an open forum VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #264

Did it get classified between his being given the question and the hearing? dsc Feb 2014 #287

He made a mistake....being mistaken is no the same as lying.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #288

Let me just say if you or I made such a mistake dsc Feb 2014 #290

The question was crystal clear. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #291

No, he didn't treestar Feb 2014 #222

What websites have you been Googling Aerows Feb 2014 #254

AGREED....and I will always take President Obama's position over VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #289

You have to excuse some around here, their abilities only allow them to make 'fuck xyz' statements. Rex Feb 2014 #249

I doubt that he'd be interested. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #23

ROFL! Puglover Feb 2014 #69

. Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2014 #112

Shut the fuck up Greenwad. SoapBox Jan 2014 #3

He's a full United States citizen Titonwan Feb 2014 #18

A person is a US citizen or they are not treestar Feb 2014 #225

Well, now Aerows Feb 2014 #261

There's no such thing as a "full citizen" treestar Feb 2014 #349

Nitpicking Aerows Feb 2014 #352

As in natural born in the U.S.A. n/t Titonwan Feb 2014 #335

People born citizens outside the US are no less citizens treestar Feb 2014 #350

You can't be president Titonwan Feb 2014 #358

Is he disturbing your comfortable denial bubble? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #22

You know, I use to be there with the 'fuck XYZ' until I stepped back Rex Feb 2014 #33

Until it mattered :D Aerows Feb 2014 #76

Change is good for people, often it is a growing experience. Rex Feb 2014 #190

You are a good egg, Rex Aerows Feb 2014 #191

I like it when you speak up. Rex Feb 2014 #192

Sunshine is *definitely* needed Aerows Feb 2014 #195

Yes I think it is about time the WH gets involved. Rex Feb 2014 #198

Cowards don't get a say... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #59

Who is the coward? Aerows Feb 2014 #81

"Former American"? Has he renounced his US citizenship? (n/t) SMC22307 Feb 2014 #279

This message was self-deleted by its author itsrobert Jan 2014 #4

Homophobia. Klassy! LeftyMom Jan 2014 #7

^^^^^^ +100. n/t slipslidingaway Jan 2014 #8

Sounds like you got to see the REAL deal. Titonwan Feb 2014 #19

Now it is as bad to criticize the opinion and actions of some gays as it is to criticize the actions kelliekat44 Feb 2014 #72

I take it you missed the edit. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #83

"Criticizing the actions of some gays" is not the issue. There's nothing wrong with that. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #177

Exactly. n/t Aerows Feb 2014 #187

Nice save ... 1000words Feb 2014 #11

I wish the edit feature was only for grammar and not a quick retreat from someone's true ... slipslidingaway Feb 2014 #12

Actually one thing this website is fairly Puglover Feb 2014 #71

We can read what you wrote originally, you know. MineralMan Feb 2014 #27

Heterophobia should not be allowed also. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #35

Is that like reverse racism? Aerows Feb 2014 #45

Works both ways. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #47

The gays and the blacks are coming for your rights! Aerows Feb 2014 #48

+1 bravenak Feb 2014 #68

you forgot women dlwickham Feb 2014 #84

Yep. Daring to discuss such things means Aerows Feb 2014 #98

Hating someone for who they are, and being suspicious because of what they *do*, are not at all nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #174

Perhaps you have not traveled far enough in life, it happens. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #178

Perhaps *you* haven't traveled far enough not to take every damn thing personally... nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #184

I reread your post Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #185

Well, that's a shame, but even if misguided that doesn't mean there's no reason for it. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #197

Yes I agree, that runs rampant on DU William769 Feb 2014 #56

Where is heterophobia on DU? What do you mean? Please clarify, thank you. uppityperson Feb 2014 #80

Maybe from those crying about homophobia. it works both ways. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #85

What do you mean? Those fighting against homophobia are heterophobic? Please clarify, using uppityperson Feb 2014 #86

Simple, if a known gay person has something negative said against them then it turns into Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #88

Thank you. Could you give me an example of either of those, I'd appreciate seeing what you mean. uppityperson Feb 2014 #90

Sure, in this thread Greenwald accuses Obama of not prosecuting the powerful, Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #100

Do you mean this now edited homophobic post or the ones talking about it? uppityperson Feb 2014 #102

Your dog does not seem to be able to hunt, sorry. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #104

Aparagus is tasty, you are welcome. Is that post homophobic? uppityperson Feb 2014 #105

Try post # 7 Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #108

Are you Leftymom? I'm not sure what you're saying nt riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #109

Post #7 is saying the previous post is homophobic. Do you think it is homophobic? Are you LeftyMom? uppityperson Feb 2014 #111

This is what you're going to hear now. William769 Feb 2014 #116

Aw, you know me. I like to clarify before jumping on someone's shit as words can be used in differen uppityperson Feb 2014 #117

you wanted to know where homophobic was, i gave you the post information. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #119

No, I wanted to know if YOU think that post is homophobic. I wanted to know where heterophobic uppityperson Feb 2014 #124

Reread your post # 80. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #125

You mean one about heterophobia you haven't answered yet? Yes. I see it. Will you answer? uppityperson Feb 2014 #126

Neither should be in DU, if someone calling another homophobic then they need to have heterophic Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #129

If I call a racist a racist for saying something like all n*ers love watermelon, that makes me a uppityperson Feb 2014 #136

Someone who calls out a bigot for bigotry is because of that a bigot themselves? uppityperson Feb 2014 #128

There are times when one may be bigoted one way and call the other bigoted but likewise be bigoted Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #130

You do realize this is the same argument used by Pat Robertson and his ilk? riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #132

Why in the hell can there not be civilized dicussions without jumping in with "homophoic" Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #134

Why in the hell can there not be civilized discussions without jumping in with homophobia? uppityperson Feb 2014 #137

So you have no problem with racism? William769 Feb 2014 #139

Yes, do I like to see and hear racism or sexism and I do not like the titles bestowed on others. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #144

Oh so it's only homophobia you don't have a problem with. William769 Feb 2014 #145

I DONT LIKE THE HOMOPHOBIC OR THE HETEROPHOBIC!!! I never said I like one or the Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #148

You have said so over & over and over. William769 Feb 2014 #151

WTH, do you want me to say, I get along with both groups. Can a person get along Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #154

If we see homophobia, you don't want us to say it. Is this right? uppityperson Feb 2014 #152

Translation: Aerows Feb 2014 #265

People who call others on their bigotry are, by your definition, bigoted. Wow. uppityperson Feb 2014 #135

Calling me confused, wow, oh the name calling. You can step on whatever side you want, I Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #138

Homophobia kills people. Homophobia denies equal rights. You don't care. uppityperson Feb 2014 #142

You have a problem and you need to deal with it. You are writing a script which has totally Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #146

No, you are the one complaining about us calling out bigotry. Or is it is sexual orientation bigotry uppityperson Feb 2014 #150

+1 Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #158

Thank you, trying to clarify what they meant rather than insulting. Language, esp on the internet, uppityperson Feb 2014 #161

I had to bow out of that conversation Aerows Feb 2014 #196

One last simple (truly) question. Where in the world do you live? What country, state, etc, as you uppityperson Feb 2014 #143

I am a natural born citizen of the US, many generations in the US. Proud American, lifelong Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #156

Thank you for answering, your grammar sounded ESL and I wanted to make sure we were uppityperson Feb 2014 #157

I write hoping others do not confuse what I am trying to convey, I must point out you Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #160

I love this Aerows Feb 2014 #189

I was wrong. You got this. William769 Feb 2014 #122

I'm not sure anyone can "get" this... riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #127

I especially like the idea Aerows Feb 2014 #269

A couple of days ago we were called bullies. William769 Feb 2014 #114

Apparently, now we are thugs. Behind the Aegis Feb 2014 #163

I tried to alert but got a split vote. Seems this is "too difficult" for DUers to understand riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #164

Please do not get discouraged, riderinthestorm. Sissyk Feb 2014 #172

. riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #173

In this thread, #1 and #3 were strongly anti-Greenwald, but they did not mention his sexuality muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #202

Actually post #4 was homophobic, someone replied there was not a need for homophobic Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #205

The problem is what you wrote in #88 muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #206

You know, Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #219

You are implying there have been heterophobic attacks on DU muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #234

I do not diminish homophobia any more than I diminish heterophobia in which many seems to Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #247

It isn't hate to point out Aerows Feb 2014 #281

This is what I did on my first post on this thread and the responses went bad so Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #292

Because there is rampant "heterophobia" on DU? Aerows Feb 2014 #293

Has already happened, did not see a reason for it but I lived. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #297

Are you seriously going to sit there Aerows Feb 2014 #300

This message was self-deleted by its author William769 Feb 2014 #304

I need to ask you, is there any reason you to try and change my opinion from being neutral? Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #306

When you defend homophobic remarks Aerows Feb 2014 #307

Saying I am neutral is a homophobic remark? Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #309

Pretending to be neutral Aerows Feb 2014 #311

I will not change my opinion, I am required to work everyday in the public, I refuse Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #317

Being a bigot Aerows Feb 2014 #321

That's what you say. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #341

That's my story Aerows Feb 2014 #342

You probably won't watch this but here is a teaching moment William769 Feb 2014 #364

Here is where you and several others here are totally wrong, if you had read many post Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #367

If you did watch as you say you did. William769 Feb 2014 #368

My comprehension is quiet well, this has been overblown by others, the only thing I can Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #370

I leave you with this thought (take it for what it's worth). William769 Feb 2014 #371

This is a joke marym625 Feb 2014 #176

In my six or so years with DU Fearless Feb 2014 #194

Heterophobia? MineralMan Feb 2014 #203

I don't agree with deleting posts. People ought to stand by what they say or don't sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #39

Thats not that persons first comment like that. William769 Feb 2014 #54

It really should be their last. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #140

No argument from me. William769 Feb 2014 #141

Edit history allows us to see that you made a homophobic comment typical of those Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #58

Your blatantly homphobic post is still there for people to see. last1standing Feb 2014 #62

Is the entire BOG populated with bigots, or would you consider yourself an outlier? Doctor_J Feb 2014 #103

God that was petty. Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #155

awww fascisthunter Feb 2014 #215

Pffffft. Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #266

You reject it ... 1000words Feb 2014 #315

Looking forward... OnyxCollie Jan 2014 #5

The truth hurts. n/t Titonwan Jan 2014 #6

+1. nt La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2014 #10

+2 Octafish Feb 2014 #107

shut your hole you creepy little has been shit. n/t Whisp Feb 2014 #13

I thought it was against DU rules to insult a newbie here at DU. nt grasswire Feb 2014 #17

I don't think that was against the poster. Aimed at Glen. Autumn Feb 2014 #38

Another insightful rebuttal. Marr Feb 2014 #168

Yep! Juvenile, isn't it? n/t truth2power Feb 2014 #268

When did it become the President's job to prosecute people for Congressional testimony? ProSense Feb 2014 #14

How about crimes against the Bush administration ... slipslidingaway Feb 2014 #15

1789 MFrohike Feb 2014 #20

Like I asked ProSense Feb 2014 #28

'and prosecutes'...can't make it any more obvious for you. Rex Feb 2014 #32

When they dont have an argument, they try to distract. Strawmen abound. nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #36

Yes the selective reading is pretty amusing. Rex Feb 2014 #199

Asked and answered. Interesting that you love to give the Pres credit for things like rhett o rick Feb 2014 #34

executive branch enforces the law questionseverything Feb 2014 #55

OK, ProSense Feb 2014 #63

simply encourage him to do his job questionseverything Feb 2014 #67

since the advent of perjury laws dsc Feb 2014 #21

Who said that? Do you have a quote? Distract much? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #24

So the other responses above yours were also confused? n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #29

Derp. Rex Feb 2014 #25

When fuckhead wants some attention.. he Cha Feb 2014 #31

Just start a thread: Obama sucks. ProSense Feb 2014 #64

Or to defend those who lie to Congress? sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #40

or lying to supreme court questionseverything Feb 2014 #73

Notice he ran away with his tail between his legs. Rex Feb 2014 #250

Ratification n/t TransitJohn Feb 2014 #43

GG's idiotic on public policy, a crappy lawyer,a lousy political analyst, and an all-around a-hole struggle4progress Feb 2014 #16

I couldnt get past your ad hominem attacks. Where do you get your hatred for Greenwald? rhett o rick Feb 2014 #26

I gave the arguments in the post struggle4progress Feb 2014 #30

Sorry but I didnt get past your ad hominem attacks. I figure if you think that's necessary rhett o rick Feb 2014 #37

K & R Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #41

It's a shame he has found an excuse not to prosecute Glenn. TheMathieu Feb 2014 #42

What law has Glen broken? Autumn Feb 2014 #46

That's easy, receiving stolen goods. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #49

Yeah, kind of like the Pentagon Papers were stolen goods. Autumn Feb 2014 #52

Perhaps or perhaps more. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #70

I suppose it would be irresponsible not to speculate. truebluegreen Feb 2014 #97

LOL Aerows Feb 2014 #347

Revenge fantasies bobduca Feb 2014 #175

Oh for fuck's sake. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #180

I love how much this thread pisses off the BOG. DesMoinesDem Feb 2014 #44

Spittin' mad over a tweet! Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #50

This thread is filled with pouty temper tantrums over a small kernel of truth. pa28 Feb 2014 #66

Ain't it grand?????????? Puglover Feb 2014 #74

I bet not a single one of them actually read the article Skittles Feb 2014 #106

I see some ass kickings (sic) in the horizon. :-P Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2014 #115

Seeing the name of the hated Greenwald, QC Feb 2014 #121

LOL....STOP IT QC Skittles Feb 2014 #131

^^ this bobduca Feb 2014 #149

Dog that is the truth! neverforget Feb 2014 #296

That's the difference between us, DesMoinesDem. randome Feb 2014 #113

And the difference between *us* is that I don't get discomfited Fumesucker Feb 2014 #286

Touche! randome Feb 2014 #366

BOG Defense System Activated bobduca Feb 2014 #147

OMG, I've got to get to bed, but this thread is too f*ckin' funny. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #188

Same here. Marr Feb 2014 #170

That's odd treestar Feb 2014 #226

I know there hosts are all in here crying like 5 year olds. Rex Feb 2014 #251

LOL & Thanks. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #51

K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2014 #53

Greenwald: Excellent at self promotion. bravenak Feb 2014 #61

As there is no way anyone in the public eye can say anything at all WITHOUT running the risk of sibelian Feb 2014 #200

I bet you think that what you just said was quite profound. bravenak Feb 2014 #201

Eddie and Julian couldn't get any play today treestar Feb 2014 #229

Looks like homophobic smears and straw man arguments are all the Swarm has to offer. last1standing Feb 2014 #65

It isn't homophobia, apperently Aerows Feb 2014 #82

+1 Marr Feb 2014 #171

"the Swarm" grasswire Feb 2014 #354

Remember, "it's a big club and you ain't in it." polichick Feb 2014 #79

So it wouild be good for a Republican President whistler162 Feb 2014 #91

He's still looking for those "comfortable walking shoes". Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 #93

I know, Obama should prosecute anyone who is trying to get out of paying their back taxes. randome Feb 2014 #110

Isn't it amazing Andy823 Feb 2014 #118

Not to mention the fact that this thread has gone way off its intended rails. randome Feb 2014 #120

Yep, Andy823 Feb 2014 #123

You Better Believe It! treestar Feb 2014 #233

Is that the BOG's crowning achievement? SMC22307 Feb 2014 #329

No I believe Better Believe It didn't need the bog treestar Feb 2014 #351

Rails? Aerows Feb 2014 #298

new poster, you think? i'd wager a bunch of return customers in this thread... dionysus Feb 2014 #167

You are probably right nt Andy823 Feb 2014 #218

Everybody better hold on ... the next decision from our potus will .. MindMover Feb 2014 #133

Obama also kicks puppies competitively for distance and accuracy ... JoePhilly Feb 2014 #153

excellent OP frwrfpos Feb 2014 #166

Didn't Greenwald support Bush? WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #181

No but some here keep repeating it as if it were fact. bobduca Feb 2014 #183

Jump back, dude. I'm merely asking a question. WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #186

My honest apology bobduca Feb 2014 #204

Apology accepted WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #299

He is a "libertarian" treestar Feb 2014 #231

Yeah he wrote three books all anti-Dubya but don't let the facts get in your way! Rex Feb 2014 #248

He slammed Bush on a constant basis Exciting Trip Feb 2014 #365

Since Glenn is not an Attorney General treestar Feb 2014 #221

Makes you wonder what the Prez could have accomplished... MrScorpio Feb 2014 #238

Can't Greenwald just go back to defending Nazis? gulliver Feb 2014 #246

oh brother... fascisthunter Feb 2014 #259

oh god it`s greenwald again.... madrchsod Feb 2014 #252

Obama said we should move forward not backward regarding torturers Exciting Trip Feb 2014 #305

Good of you to show up. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #328

Forward not backward Exciting Trip Feb 2014 #330

You're confusing me... SMC22307 Feb 2014 #337

The excuses are not excellent. Orsino Feb 2014 #369