General Discussion

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)

289. AGREED....and I will always take President Obama's position over

Reply to treestar (Reply #222)

Sun Feb 2, 2014, 04:56 PM

Feb 2014

Rand Paul, Darryl Issa and Jim Sensenbrenner any day!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

372 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Greenwald: Obama "excellent at finding excuses not to prosecute the most powerful" [View all] Exciting Trip Jan 2014 OP

Fuck greenwald. Cha Jan 2014 #1

I don't care if it was Hitler saying it dsc Jan 2014 #2

You are, of course, 100% correct. Shemp Howard Feb 2014 #9

NO he didn't....if he did the REPUBLICAN Congress would be all up in his shit... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #60

Did it ever occur to you that maybe Aerows Feb 2014 #75

but they aren't.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #77

Warren and Sanders are such horrible people Aerows Feb 2014 #78

they are? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #162

Where is this bus? Aerows Feb 2014 #193

NO its the ones that the "purists" throw everyone else under.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #207

They must be, as they serve in Congress treestar Feb 2014 #223

Oh, well Aerows Feb 2014 #236

Especially Warren, you should throw her under the bus treestar Feb 2014 #241

Oh, I'm sorry Aerows Feb 2014 #256

who you calling pure? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #333

Take it up with Treestar. Aerows Feb 2014 #336

and I asked why you "expounded" on it... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #338

Because it was relevant to the conversation Aerows Feb 2014 #340

So because the Republicans are upset, therefore he didnt lie. Is that your argument? rhett o rick Feb 2014 #99

As long as it is official the Obama Administration kept Aerows Feb 2014 #101

So the big question is why did he keep two of Bush's authoritarian Republicans? rhett o rick Feb 2014 #217

Either/or Aerows Feb 2014 #345

I heard it and I also know that when you work in the field he does... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #169

So you forgive his obvious lie because why? The question was simple and yet he lied. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #179

there wasn't a lie...that was my point... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #208

Your argument is very limited. How do you come to the conclusion that he didnt rhett o rick Feb 2014 #211

limited because I do not believe we live in a Black and White world like you? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #212

So you wont tell us why you think he didnt lie? You must have a good rhett o rick Feb 2014 #220

AND that has been explained to you multiple times...IF it was such a bald faced lie VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #224

That is a logical fallacy. Just because he hasnt been prosecuted doesnt rhett o rick Feb 2014 #227

I know how you LOVE to use that phrase but... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #230

Thanks for the link which finished with, ""Perjury is a serious crime. Mr. Clapper should resign rhett o rick Feb 2014 #243

and it is not being prosecuted for it....but YOU deem him guilty without a trial... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #244

I trust a Democratic Senator over a Republican General. How about you? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #228

Do you trust Rand Paul and Darryl Issa? Because they both agree with YOU! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #232

I trust a Democratic Senator over a Republican General. nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #240

and I trust President Obama over Rand Paul, Darryl Issa and Jim Sensenbrenner.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #242

Do you really believe the stupid accusations you make fascisthunter Feb 2014 #257

Do I believe that there are those in this conversation that agree with the positions of VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #262

you trust your beloved President over anyone. You don't seem to grasp that cali Feb 2014 #276

I trust HIM over the words of that bunch... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #277

Please stop! That's a disinformation tactic and you know it... truth2power Feb 2014 #355

your world is incredibly binary: Anything Obama does or says: Good, great, must be cali Feb 2014 #271

Mostly I do yes....You have a problem with Democrats supporting the Democratic President? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #274

YOU have a huge problem with liberal dem politicians who don't support the President on cali Feb 2014 #278

Liberal Democrats no....no I don't VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #283

lol. still trying the childish, inance and transparent attempt at linking cali Feb 2014 #280

No I try the truth... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #284

"and are you threatening me?" SMC22307 Feb 2014 #314

You made the statement...I was just asking...sounded like a veiled one to me... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #316

I can almost see the spittle flying. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #319

Oh yes...here comes chapter 7 in the manual VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #322

You're doing a good job of that on your own. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #326

and yet....here you are... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #327

I only care that two pot states are fielding teams. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #334

Better than that false concern about my health I got.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #339

I don't speak for that poster. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #343

So you would rather have someone falsely ask about your health? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #344

I couldn't care less who asks me what on an "anonymous" message board. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #346

hmmmm I don't think soo.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #348

lol. you think you can debate? at all? too funny, vanilla cali Feb 2014 #363

please post anything I wrote to you that can be construed in any way as a threat. cali Feb 2014 #362

there are some "rightwing Repukes" that DO agree with YOU on this matter... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #285

I've noticed three or four posters - all with the same avatar Fawke Em Feb 2014 #357

He lied, period. And what is a Bush loyalist and appointee doing in a Democratic (note the spelling) sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #182

NOT Period...just like I said IF it was sooooo "period" he would have been charged...by the VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #209

Yes, it's been "period" since it happened for anyone who isn't an idiot or a shill. DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2014 #353

So are you calling me an idiot or a shill? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #356

What do you think, VR? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2014 #359

I don't know...you are the one accusating! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #360

I'm accusating? You know the George W Bush glossary is supposed to be humorous, right? DisgustipatedinCA Feb 2014 #361

LOL! cui bono Aug 2014 #372

God forbid he piss off the Republicans Doctor_J Feb 2014 #159

I don't need your approval at all.....the President agrees with me... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #245

This is the second time I've seen you use that laughably stupid, circular excuse. Marr Feb 2014 #165

You think they wouldn't toss him overboard to smear Obama? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #210

Did they? Marr Feb 2014 #213

NO THAT you are right about....this ISN'T complex... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #214

He lied, period. Marr Feb 2014 #216

No he didn't but Darryl Issa, Rand Paul and Jim Sennsenbrenner all agree with you... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #237

Again, why are you so doggedly defending this Republican liar? Marr Feb 2014 #270

for the same reason President Obama did...see my previous post... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #272

Please-- let me help you. I want you to stop making a fool of yourself. Marr Feb 2014 #275

You are asking a dogged apologist for the NSA. Aerows Feb 2014 #303

Clapper believes WMDs were shipped from Iraq to Syria before the war. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #235

And President Obama says of the incident... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #239

Yes, let's! SMC22307 Feb 2014 #253

Well we know of at least one such instance don't we? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #255

"Democrat" Party? SMC22307 Feb 2014 #258

a freaking typo...that's the best you got? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #260

LOL SMC22307 Feb 2014 #267

No kidding. Marr Feb 2014 #273

It's reached the cat playing with a half-dead mouse stage. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #282

of course he lied to Congress-- that is not in question.... mike_c Feb 2014 #332

Bullshit!.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #57

Robert Litt is general counsel to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence nt G_j Feb 2014 #87

You dont mean to suggest he might have a bias? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #95

I agree that it's bullshit. Let's take a look at it. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #89

Lets take a look at who DOES agree with you... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #263

completely irrelevant and you (should) know that G_j Feb 2014 #294

I don't find it irrelevant....if those guys agree with you... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #295

talk about bullshit. G_j Feb 2014 #301

Bullshit only because Rand Paul, Darryl Issa and Jim Sensenbrenner agreeing with you VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #302

yea, and I bet they think water is wet too, G_j Feb 2014 #308

So I guess you agree then... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #310

I don't know what they think G_j Feb 2014 #312

I do...I posted what THEY think earlier in this conversation that you thought you just had to add VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #313

then please explain in a comprehensible manner, why their G_j Feb 2014 #331

OMG - the clock was right twice in one day! Aerows Feb 2014 #318

whatever gets you through the night... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #320

I'll just make sure to note Aerows Feb 2014 #323

only thing I used my fingers for so far today is eating and typing... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #324

Well, I wasn't planning on sharing, but Aerows Feb 2014 #325

He was provided the questions in ADVANCE dsc Feb 2014 #92

He was provided the question in advance, the question was straight forward and easy to rhett o rick Feb 2014 #94

I had forgotten the second time dsc Feb 2014 #96

and he THOUGHt he was being asked a question about National Security in an open forum VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #264

Did it get classified between his being given the question and the hearing? dsc Feb 2014 #287

He made a mistake....being mistaken is no the same as lying.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #288

Let me just say if you or I made such a mistake dsc Feb 2014 #290

The question was crystal clear. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #291

No, he didn't treestar Feb 2014 #222

What websites have you been Googling Aerows Feb 2014 #254

AGREED....and I will always take President Obama's position over VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #289

You have to excuse some around here, their abilities only allow them to make 'fuck xyz' statements. Rex Feb 2014 #249

I doubt that he'd be interested. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #23

ROFL! Puglover Feb 2014 #69

. Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2014 #112

Shut the fuck up Greenwad. SoapBox Jan 2014 #3

He's a full United States citizen Titonwan Feb 2014 #18

A person is a US citizen or they are not treestar Feb 2014 #225

Well, now Aerows Feb 2014 #261

There's no such thing as a "full citizen" treestar Feb 2014 #349

Nitpicking Aerows Feb 2014 #352

As in natural born in the U.S.A. n/t Titonwan Feb 2014 #335

People born citizens outside the US are no less citizens treestar Feb 2014 #350

You can't be president Titonwan Feb 2014 #358

Is he disturbing your comfortable denial bubble? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #22

You know, I use to be there with the 'fuck XYZ' until I stepped back Rex Feb 2014 #33

Until it mattered :D Aerows Feb 2014 #76

Change is good for people, often it is a growing experience. Rex Feb 2014 #190

You are a good egg, Rex Aerows Feb 2014 #191

I like it when you speak up. Rex Feb 2014 #192

Sunshine is *definitely* needed Aerows Feb 2014 #195

Yes I think it is about time the WH gets involved. Rex Feb 2014 #198

Cowards don't get a say... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #59

Who is the coward? Aerows Feb 2014 #81

"Former American"? Has he renounced his US citizenship? (n/t) SMC22307 Feb 2014 #279

This message was self-deleted by its author itsrobert Jan 2014 #4

Homophobia. Klassy! LeftyMom Jan 2014 #7

^^^^^^ +100. n/t slipslidingaway Jan 2014 #8

Sounds like you got to see the REAL deal. Titonwan Feb 2014 #19

Now it is as bad to criticize the opinion and actions of some gays as it is to criticize the actions kelliekat44 Feb 2014 #72

I take it you missed the edit. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #83

"Criticizing the actions of some gays" is not the issue. There's nothing wrong with that. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #177

Exactly. n/t Aerows Feb 2014 #187

Nice save ... 1000words Feb 2014 #11

I wish the edit feature was only for grammar and not a quick retreat from someone's true ... slipslidingaway Feb 2014 #12

Actually one thing this website is fairly Puglover Feb 2014 #71

We can read what you wrote originally, you know. MineralMan Feb 2014 #27

Heterophobia should not be allowed also. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #35

Is that like reverse racism? Aerows Feb 2014 #45

Works both ways. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #47

The gays and the blacks are coming for your rights! Aerows Feb 2014 #48

+1 bravenak Feb 2014 #68

you forgot women dlwickham Feb 2014 #84

Yep. Daring to discuss such things means Aerows Feb 2014 #98

Hating someone for who they are, and being suspicious because of what they *do*, are not at all nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #174

Perhaps you have not traveled far enough in life, it happens. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #178

Perhaps *you* haven't traveled far enough not to take every damn thing personally... nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #184

I reread your post Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #185

Well, that's a shame, but even if misguided that doesn't mean there's no reason for it. nomorenomore08 Feb 2014 #197

Yes I agree, that runs rampant on DU William769 Feb 2014 #56

Where is heterophobia on DU? What do you mean? Please clarify, thank you. uppityperson Feb 2014 #80

Maybe from those crying about homophobia. it works both ways. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #85

What do you mean? Those fighting against homophobia are heterophobic? Please clarify, using uppityperson Feb 2014 #86

Simple, if a known gay person has something negative said against them then it turns into Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #88

Thank you. Could you give me an example of either of those, I'd appreciate seeing what you mean. uppityperson Feb 2014 #90

Sure, in this thread Greenwald accuses Obama of not prosecuting the powerful, Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #100

Do you mean this now edited homophobic post or the ones talking about it? uppityperson Feb 2014 #102

Your dog does not seem to be able to hunt, sorry. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #104

Aparagus is tasty, you are welcome. Is that post homophobic? uppityperson Feb 2014 #105

Try post # 7 Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #108

Are you Leftymom? I'm not sure what you're saying nt riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #109

Post #7 is saying the previous post is homophobic. Do you think it is homophobic? Are you LeftyMom? uppityperson Feb 2014 #111

This is what you're going to hear now. William769 Feb 2014 #116

Aw, you know me. I like to clarify before jumping on someone's shit as words can be used in differen uppityperson Feb 2014 #117

you wanted to know where homophobic was, i gave you the post information. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #119

No, I wanted to know if YOU think that post is homophobic. I wanted to know where heterophobic uppityperson Feb 2014 #124

Reread your post # 80. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #125

You mean one about heterophobia you haven't answered yet? Yes. I see it. Will you answer? uppityperson Feb 2014 #126

Neither should be in DU, if someone calling another homophobic then they need to have heterophic Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #129

If I call a racist a racist for saying something like all n*ers love watermelon, that makes me a uppityperson Feb 2014 #136

Someone who calls out a bigot for bigotry is because of that a bigot themselves? uppityperson Feb 2014 #128

There are times when one may be bigoted one way and call the other bigoted but likewise be bigoted Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #130

You do realize this is the same argument used by Pat Robertson and his ilk? riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #132

Why in the hell can there not be civilized dicussions without jumping in with "homophoic" Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #134

Why in the hell can there not be civilized discussions without jumping in with homophobia? uppityperson Feb 2014 #137

So you have no problem with racism? William769 Feb 2014 #139

Yes, do I like to see and hear racism or sexism and I do not like the titles bestowed on others. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #144

Oh so it's only homophobia you don't have a problem with. William769 Feb 2014 #145

I DONT LIKE THE HOMOPHOBIC OR THE HETEROPHOBIC!!! I never said I like one or the Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #148

You have said so over & over and over. William769 Feb 2014 #151

WTH, do you want me to say, I get along with both groups. Can a person get along Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #154

If we see homophobia, you don't want us to say it. Is this right? uppityperson Feb 2014 #152

Translation: Aerows Feb 2014 #265

People who call others on their bigotry are, by your definition, bigoted. Wow. uppityperson Feb 2014 #135

Calling me confused, wow, oh the name calling. You can step on whatever side you want, I Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #138

Homophobia kills people. Homophobia denies equal rights. You don't care. uppityperson Feb 2014 #142

You have a problem and you need to deal with it. You are writing a script which has totally Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #146

No, you are the one complaining about us calling out bigotry. Or is it is sexual orientation bigotry uppityperson Feb 2014 #150

+1 Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #158

Thank you, trying to clarify what they meant rather than insulting. Language, esp on the internet, uppityperson Feb 2014 #161

I had to bow out of that conversation Aerows Feb 2014 #196

One last simple (truly) question. Where in the world do you live? What country, state, etc, as you uppityperson Feb 2014 #143

I am a natural born citizen of the US, many generations in the US. Proud American, lifelong Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #156

Thank you for answering, your grammar sounded ESL and I wanted to make sure we were uppityperson Feb 2014 #157

I write hoping others do not confuse what I am trying to convey, I must point out you Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #160

I love this Aerows Feb 2014 #189

I was wrong. You got this. William769 Feb 2014 #122

I'm not sure anyone can "get" this... riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #127

I especially like the idea Aerows Feb 2014 #269

A couple of days ago we were called bullies. William769 Feb 2014 #114

Apparently, now we are thugs. Behind the Aegis Feb 2014 #163

I tried to alert but got a split vote. Seems this is "too difficult" for DUers to understand riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #164

Please do not get discouraged, riderinthestorm. Sissyk Feb 2014 #172

. riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #173

In this thread, #1 and #3 were strongly anti-Greenwald, but they did not mention his sexuality muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #202

Actually post #4 was homophobic, someone replied there was not a need for homophobic Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #205

The problem is what you wrote in #88 muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #206

You know, Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #219

You are implying there have been heterophobic attacks on DU muriel_volestrangler Feb 2014 #234

I do not diminish homophobia any more than I diminish heterophobia in which many seems to Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #247

It isn't hate to point out Aerows Feb 2014 #281

This is what I did on my first post on this thread and the responses went bad so Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #292

Because there is rampant "heterophobia" on DU? Aerows Feb 2014 #293

Has already happened, did not see a reason for it but I lived. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #297

Are you seriously going to sit there Aerows Feb 2014 #300

This message was self-deleted by its author William769 Feb 2014 #304

I need to ask you, is there any reason you to try and change my opinion from being neutral? Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #306

When you defend homophobic remarks Aerows Feb 2014 #307

Saying I am neutral is a homophobic remark? Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #309

Pretending to be neutral Aerows Feb 2014 #311

I will not change my opinion, I am required to work everyday in the public, I refuse Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #317

Being a bigot Aerows Feb 2014 #321

That's what you say. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #341

That's my story Aerows Feb 2014 #342

You probably won't watch this but here is a teaching moment William769 Feb 2014 #364

Here is where you and several others here are totally wrong, if you had read many post Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #367

If you did watch as you say you did. William769 Feb 2014 #368

My comprehension is quiet well, this has been overblown by others, the only thing I can Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #370

I leave you with this thought (take it for what it's worth). William769 Feb 2014 #371

This is a joke marym625 Feb 2014 #176

In my six or so years with DU Fearless Feb 2014 #194

Heterophobia? MineralMan Feb 2014 #203

I don't agree with deleting posts. People ought to stand by what they say or don't sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #39

Thats not that persons first comment like that. William769 Feb 2014 #54

It really should be their last. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #140

No argument from me. William769 Feb 2014 #141

Edit history allows us to see that you made a homophobic comment typical of those Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #58

Your blatantly homphobic post is still there for people to see. last1standing Feb 2014 #62

Is the entire BOG populated with bigots, or would you consider yourself an outlier? Doctor_J Feb 2014 #103

God that was petty. Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #155

awww fascisthunter Feb 2014 #215

Pffffft. Bobbie Jo Feb 2014 #266

You reject it ... 1000words Feb 2014 #315

Looking forward... OnyxCollie Jan 2014 #5

The truth hurts. n/t Titonwan Jan 2014 #6

+1. nt La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2014 #10

+2 Octafish Feb 2014 #107

shut your hole you creepy little has been shit. n/t Whisp Feb 2014 #13

I thought it was against DU rules to insult a newbie here at DU. nt grasswire Feb 2014 #17

I don't think that was against the poster. Aimed at Glen. Autumn Feb 2014 #38

Another insightful rebuttal. Marr Feb 2014 #168

Yep! Juvenile, isn't it? n/t truth2power Feb 2014 #268

When did it become the President's job to prosecute people for Congressional testimony? ProSense Feb 2014 #14

How about crimes against the Bush administration ... slipslidingaway Feb 2014 #15

1789 MFrohike Feb 2014 #20

Like I asked ProSense Feb 2014 #28

'and prosecutes'...can't make it any more obvious for you. Rex Feb 2014 #32

When they dont have an argument, they try to distract. Strawmen abound. nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #36

Yes the selective reading is pretty amusing. Rex Feb 2014 #199

Asked and answered. Interesting that you love to give the Pres credit for things like rhett o rick Feb 2014 #34

executive branch enforces the law questionseverything Feb 2014 #55

OK, ProSense Feb 2014 #63

simply encourage him to do his job questionseverything Feb 2014 #67

since the advent of perjury laws dsc Feb 2014 #21

Who said that? Do you have a quote? Distract much? nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #24

So the other responses above yours were also confused? n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #29

Derp. Rex Feb 2014 #25

When fuckhead wants some attention.. he Cha Feb 2014 #31

Just start a thread: Obama sucks. ProSense Feb 2014 #64

Or to defend those who lie to Congress? sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #40

or lying to supreme court questionseverything Feb 2014 #73

Notice he ran away with his tail between his legs. Rex Feb 2014 #250

Ratification n/t TransitJohn Feb 2014 #43

GG's idiotic on public policy, a crappy lawyer,a lousy political analyst, and an all-around a-hole struggle4progress Feb 2014 #16

I couldnt get past your ad hominem attacks. Where do you get your hatred for Greenwald? rhett o rick Feb 2014 #26

I gave the arguments in the post struggle4progress Feb 2014 #30

Sorry but I didnt get past your ad hominem attacks. I figure if you think that's necessary rhett o rick Feb 2014 #37

K & R Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #41

It's a shame he has found an excuse not to prosecute Glenn. TheMathieu Feb 2014 #42

What law has Glen broken? Autumn Feb 2014 #46

That's easy, receiving stolen goods. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #49

Yeah, kind of like the Pentagon Papers were stolen goods. Autumn Feb 2014 #52

Perhaps or perhaps more. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #70

I suppose it would be irresponsible not to speculate. truebluegreen Feb 2014 #97

LOL Aerows Feb 2014 #347

Revenge fantasies bobduca Feb 2014 #175

Oh for fuck's sake. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #180

I love how much this thread pisses off the BOG. DesMoinesDem Feb 2014 #44

Spittin' mad over a tweet! Luminous Animal Feb 2014 #50

This thread is filled with pouty temper tantrums over a small kernel of truth. pa28 Feb 2014 #66

Ain't it grand?????????? Puglover Feb 2014 #74

I bet not a single one of them actually read the article Skittles Feb 2014 #106

I see some ass kickings (sic) in the horizon. :-P Guy Whitey Corngood Feb 2014 #115

Seeing the name of the hated Greenwald, QC Feb 2014 #121

LOL....STOP IT QC Skittles Feb 2014 #131

^^ this bobduca Feb 2014 #149

Dog that is the truth! neverforget Feb 2014 #296

That's the difference between us, DesMoinesDem. randome Feb 2014 #113

And the difference between *us* is that I don't get discomfited Fumesucker Feb 2014 #286

Touche! randome Feb 2014 #366

BOG Defense System Activated bobduca Feb 2014 #147

OMG, I've got to get to bed, but this thread is too f*ckin' funny. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #188

Same here. Marr Feb 2014 #170

That's odd treestar Feb 2014 #226

I know there hosts are all in here crying like 5 year olds. Rex Feb 2014 #251

LOL & Thanks. Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #51

K & R !!! WillyT Feb 2014 #53

Greenwald: Excellent at self promotion. bravenak Feb 2014 #61

As there is no way anyone in the public eye can say anything at all WITHOUT running the risk of sibelian Feb 2014 #200

I bet you think that what you just said was quite profound. bravenak Feb 2014 #201

Eddie and Julian couldn't get any play today treestar Feb 2014 #229

Looks like homophobic smears and straw man arguments are all the Swarm has to offer. last1standing Feb 2014 #65

It isn't homophobia, apperently Aerows Feb 2014 #82

+1 Marr Feb 2014 #171

"the Swarm" grasswire Feb 2014 #354

Remember, "it's a big club and you ain't in it." polichick Feb 2014 #79

So it wouild be good for a Republican President whistler162 Feb 2014 #91

He's still looking for those "comfortable walking shoes". Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 #93

I know, Obama should prosecute anyone who is trying to get out of paying their back taxes. randome Feb 2014 #110

Isn't it amazing Andy823 Feb 2014 #118

Not to mention the fact that this thread has gone way off its intended rails. randome Feb 2014 #120

Yep, Andy823 Feb 2014 #123

You Better Believe It! treestar Feb 2014 #233

Is that the BOG's crowning achievement? SMC22307 Feb 2014 #329

No I believe Better Believe It didn't need the bog treestar Feb 2014 #351

Rails? Aerows Feb 2014 #298

new poster, you think? i'd wager a bunch of return customers in this thread... dionysus Feb 2014 #167

You are probably right nt Andy823 Feb 2014 #218

Everybody better hold on ... the next decision from our potus will .. MindMover Feb 2014 #133

Obama also kicks puppies competitively for distance and accuracy ... JoePhilly Feb 2014 #153

excellent OP frwrfpos Feb 2014 #166

Didn't Greenwald support Bush? WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #181

No but some here keep repeating it as if it were fact. bobduca Feb 2014 #183

Jump back, dude. I'm merely asking a question. WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #186

My honest apology bobduca Feb 2014 #204

Apology accepted WeekendWarrior Feb 2014 #299

He is a "libertarian" treestar Feb 2014 #231

Yeah he wrote three books all anti-Dubya but don't let the facts get in your way! Rex Feb 2014 #248

He slammed Bush on a constant basis Exciting Trip Feb 2014 #365

Since Glenn is not an Attorney General treestar Feb 2014 #221

Makes you wonder what the Prez could have accomplished... MrScorpio Feb 2014 #238

Can't Greenwald just go back to defending Nazis? gulliver Feb 2014 #246

oh brother... fascisthunter Feb 2014 #259

oh god it`s greenwald again.... madrchsod Feb 2014 #252

Obama said we should move forward not backward regarding torturers Exciting Trip Feb 2014 #305

Good of you to show up. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #328

Forward not backward Exciting Trip Feb 2014 #330

You're confusing me... SMC22307 Feb 2014 #337

The excuses are not excellent. Orsino Feb 2014 #369