Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)In 1692 a group of female children claimed to have been ... molested ... if you will ... [View all]
by scores of adults in Salem, Massachusetts. 18 of the accused were hanged. One was "pressed" to death, with stones placed upon their chest until they suffocated. With the exception of the individual who was pressed to death, all of those who were executed spoke out, claiming that the children were not being truthful.
They died proclaiming their innocence, but I guess it could have been worse. They could have been put on ignore at DU.
A caveat: I believe that damned near every child who makes a claim of abuse either was abused, or truly believes that they were.
Another caveat: I also believe that anyone who states that every such claim must be unequivocally accepted without question is an idiot.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In 1692 a group of female children claimed to have been ... molested ... if you will ... [View all]
11 Bravo
Feb 2014
OP
No one will maintain that in so many words, not when it's spelled out like that.
Silent3
Feb 2014
#91
Yeah, who needs trials and due process when YOU know who is guilty, right?
TheSarcastinator
Feb 2014
#51
That is true, and it it still one of the most expensive trials in California history.
anneboleyn
Feb 2014
#35
Of course, of course. Let's just go right to the assumption she is lying. Forget the fact that this
Squinch
Feb 2014
#9
NO!!!!! When someone says they think something is untrue, I think they think it is UNTRUE!!!
Squinch
Feb 2014
#71
Yes, yes, of course. You know all about it. She can't possibly be telling the truth.
Squinch
Feb 2014
#64
yes.....i specifically kept track of all the various traumas that happened to me
BlancheSplanchnik
Feb 2014
#44
You'll of course, link us to the the thread if not the post stating that, yes?
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#13
No post needed. I can tell you that in many states all it takes is the word of one person
SomethingFishy
Feb 2014
#17
His/her point was that allegations of children shouldn't be believe without question.
Kurska
Feb 2014
#21
i would not bother, i just let some posters stay in their little safe bubble where no one questions
loli phabay
Feb 2014
#22
no your bubble where all women are innocent and men are liars see how it works
loli phabay
Feb 2014
#29
lol alert, sorry but you got that wrong, your not that consequential to me.
loli phabay
Feb 2014
#39
Yeah, I'll take that bet. It would require about 5 seconds to link to a post stating ...
11 Bravo
Feb 2014
#42
Nor should they be discounted without question, which is a MUCH more common occurrence.
Squinch
Feb 2014
#32
Bravo, if you know anything about the witch trials, you will know that the people who were killed
Squinch
Feb 2014
#41
I have no doubt that you wrote your doctoral dissertation on the Salem Witch Trials.
11 Bravo
Feb 2014
#49
Yes. You are suggesting that Woody Allen is the victim of a witch trial. I am saying
Squinch
Feb 2014
#54
He did date actress Stacey Nelkin when she was 17 (he has never commented on this publicly)
anneboleyn
Feb 2014
#88