General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why your childhood memories may not actually have happened. [View all]Squinch
(59,788 posts)And yes, the best attitude is to be agnostic. That is my point.
Each of these threads starts with the assumption that Dylan Farrow is either lying, delusional, or deranged. That Woody Allen is a victim of a witch trial (i.e. innocent) that Dylan Farrow is telling false memories (therefore Woody Allen is innocent) or that Mia Farrow is a crazy woman who deluded her child (therefore Woody Allen is innocent.) None of them acknowledges the other side of this, and all of them speak in support of the innocence of Allen.
My favorite: Moses Farrow is a family therapist and sides with Woody Allen, and therefore Woody Allen is innocent. Which fails to mention that the eleven other surviving children support Dylan Farrow's story.
Yes, let's be agnostic, by all means. Let's acknowledge that there is a possibility that this woman's story is true.