General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why your childhood memories may not actually have happened. [View all]Silent3
(15,909 posts)In a court of law, if there is no tangible evidence, just an accusation that could be false (either a lie or a false memory), "reasonable doubt" applies, and the only correct verdict is "not guilty". Does that mean you've "discounted" the possibility that abuse took place? No, you've simply hit a limit what can be done about your suspicions.
In the court of public opinion, or in the private court you hold in your own mind, you can certainly choose to have a weaker or stronger standard of "reasonable doubt" than applies in an actual courtroom for what you think may or may not have happened in a given case. Nothing short of adamant insistence on the complete innocence of the accused, however, with no room left for doubt, amounts to "discounting" an accusation.