Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In 1692 a group of female children claimed to have been ... molested ... if you will ... [View all]BainsBane
(57,751 posts)89. Thanks for answering
Obviously I disagree with much of that. If a boyfriend of mine took up with one of my adolescent children (though like you I have none), I might well be the one who wound up in prison.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In 1692 a group of female children claimed to have been ... molested ... if you will ... [View all]
11 Bravo
Feb 2014
OP
No one will maintain that in so many words, not when it's spelled out like that.
Silent3
Feb 2014
#91
Yeah, who needs trials and due process when YOU know who is guilty, right?
TheSarcastinator
Feb 2014
#51
That is true, and it it still one of the most expensive trials in California history.
anneboleyn
Feb 2014
#35
Of course, of course. Let's just go right to the assumption she is lying. Forget the fact that this
Squinch
Feb 2014
#9
NO!!!!! When someone says they think something is untrue, I think they think it is UNTRUE!!!
Squinch
Feb 2014
#71
Yes, yes, of course. You know all about it. She can't possibly be telling the truth.
Squinch
Feb 2014
#64
yes.....i specifically kept track of all the various traumas that happened to me
BlancheSplanchnik
Feb 2014
#44
You'll of course, link us to the the thread if not the post stating that, yes?
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#13
No post needed. I can tell you that in many states all it takes is the word of one person
SomethingFishy
Feb 2014
#17
His/her point was that allegations of children shouldn't be believe without question.
Kurska
Feb 2014
#21
i would not bother, i just let some posters stay in their little safe bubble where no one questions
loli phabay
Feb 2014
#22
no your bubble where all women are innocent and men are liars see how it works
loli phabay
Feb 2014
#29
lol alert, sorry but you got that wrong, your not that consequential to me.
loli phabay
Feb 2014
#39
Yeah, I'll take that bet. It would require about 5 seconds to link to a post stating ...
11 Bravo
Feb 2014
#42
Nor should they be discounted without question, which is a MUCH more common occurrence.
Squinch
Feb 2014
#32
Bravo, if you know anything about the witch trials, you will know that the people who were killed
Squinch
Feb 2014
#41
I have no doubt that you wrote your doctoral dissertation on the Salem Witch Trials.
11 Bravo
Feb 2014
#49
Yes. You are suggesting that Woody Allen is the victim of a witch trial. I am saying
Squinch
Feb 2014
#54
He did date actress Stacey Nelkin when she was 17 (he has never commented on this publicly)
anneboleyn
Feb 2014
#88