Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,788 posts)
5. Yep. Millions of people wondering if the predictions of a bunch of
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 12:22 PM
Feb 2014

ignorant goatherds who lived 2000 years ago are true.

Intellectual laziness at its worse.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I doubt a 1st century writer would predict 21st c. capitalism. nt Deep13 Feb 2014 #1
Is 21st century capitalism really that new? FiveGoodMen Feb 2014 #12
I agree with you. In the 7000 years of written history, all the nations of the world had been Cal33 Feb 2014 #20
False. You are projecting modernity backward in time... Deep13 Feb 2014 #22
Regardless of the form of economy at any particular time in history, the main point here is Cal33 Feb 2014 #25
No, modernity has modern (commercial values),... Deep13 Feb 2014 #37
No, capitalism started in the late Middle Ages... Deep13 Feb 2014 #21
"it is the deliberate concentration of capital into the hands of industrial elite" FiveGoodMen Feb 2014 #23
The particulars are extremely different. Deep13 Feb 2014 #36
I think you are correct that capitalism started in the late Middle Ages. Prior to that a simpler Cal33 Feb 2014 #39
No, that is the old understanding of "feudalism." Deep13 Feb 2014 #44
no. why even play into the stupid myth shit? cali Feb 2014 #2
Yep. Millions of people wondering if the predictions of a bunch of stopbush Feb 2014 #5
I AM so glad that Buddhism does not AsahinaKimi Feb 2014 #3
It's recasting the world into a heroic struggle in which you are the good guy el_bryanto Feb 2014 #4
I'm sure they had campfires in sub-Vedic India! MisterP Feb 2014 #14
Yep. They sure must have had. Cal33 Feb 2014 #34
There won't be any "Antichrist." Archae Feb 2014 #6
Well, sociopaths certainly do behave in an unChristian manner, even when they do Cal33 Feb 2014 #8
Good thing your definition of Christian is the only true one. n/t trotsky Feb 2014 #30
I think none of this should be taken literally, but symbolically. Christ represents good, so Cal33 Feb 2014 #16
"Christ represents good" ? That's popular but not clear. Trillo Feb 2014 #53
I remember a passage from St. Matthew, where Jesus said to one,"Go, and sin no more." I Cal33 Feb 2014 #64
There is no such thing as an antichrist. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #7
Only if you take the Bible literally, word for word. But if the word Anti-Christ is used as a Cal33 Feb 2014 #52
I think the bible is on par with Hansel and Gretel as far as I'm concerned. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #56
Many of us think in terms of "all or nothing", zero% or 100%. As far as human living is concerned, Cal33 Feb 2014 #57
There are no useful parts of the bible. Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #60
The Bible has been written by numerous authors over many centuries. The language is often Cal33 Feb 2014 #62
The thing we were warned against in church xfundy Feb 2014 #9
Exactly, much of this crap today christians of today spew are those things I learned RKP5637 Feb 2014 #26
By and large I think what you've said is true. There are exceptions, though. Buddhism (as well Cal33 Feb 2014 #27
Yep, agree so much, I tend to use a broad brush. All good questions you pose. As a physics minor RKP5637 Feb 2014 #32
"Maybe the answer is absolutely nothing." Or the answer might be a world of a totally different Cal33 Feb 2014 #33
Thanks for the link! Very interesting! RKP5637 Feb 2014 #38
I tend to group all Republicans in the Anti- Christ category. nt octoberlib Feb 2014 #10
Well, I think that's going a little too far. It's the Republican leaders who are the heartless, Cal33 Feb 2014 #11
Well, as I recall from The Omen movies Downtown Hound Feb 2014 #13
I think that the "Fed" is the most dangerous entity. nt clarice Feb 2014 #15
Historically speaking, nations do rise and then fall. Before us, Britain was Number One. Before Cal33 Feb 2014 #35
I would like to think so.nt clarice Feb 2014 #46
Me, too. But with the ever growing numbers of sociopaths in powerful positions, both in private Cal33 Feb 2014 #47
Correct...that's why I always thought clarice Feb 2014 #48
If we last long enough as a nation, we might. Cal33 Feb 2014 #49
I always try to stay optimistic. nt clarice Feb 2014 #58
Wayne LaPierre is the anti-Christ BainsBane Feb 2014 #17
You're wrong... Archae Feb 2014 #18
If he rises from the dead BainsBane Feb 2014 #19
Weren't the writers talking about an emperor when it came to the antichrist? sakabatou Feb 2014 #24
How many heads 2naSalit Feb 2014 #28
NO! It's all a lie to make people MONEY DiverDave Feb 2014 #29
It looks like you are saying the same thing as I am. Only, you are using different words. :) Cal33 Feb 2014 #31
The AntiChrist is Corporatism demwing Feb 2014 #40
Yes, corporatism and its evil cohorts trying to subjugate the entire world and make it their slave Cal33 Feb 2014 #42
Pssst. There is no antichrist. Iggo Feb 2014 #41
Yep. Those of us who are right-wingers. Cal33 Feb 2014 #43
I meant humans, good and bad. Iggo Feb 2014 #45
I think even Satan bailed on these one percent, free market, rigged system sociopaths. kairos12 Feb 2014 #50
Scientific Materialism run amuck Berlum Feb 2014 #51
I think it more likely a shameless tactic to prevent challenge to church hierarchy and power. Trillo Feb 2014 #54
The Revelation of John of Patmos is about rebelling against Rome. The antichrist is Nero. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #55
Nero was the first Roman emperor to officially persecute the Christians. The nine emperors Cal33 Feb 2014 #59
Revelation is a symbolic political document. It does not predict the future. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #61
Yes, one can only guess at what the Revelation is saying. Nobody can know for sure what the Cal33 Feb 2014 #63
Do you think they care? (Please see quote and reply) Cal33 Feb 2014 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Could "The Anti-Chri...»Reply #5