Anyone who thinks an adult telling about being molested as a child is a liar --

[Nine]

313. The missing underpants are a claim not a fact.

It's a claim that has been disputed by at least one nanny. But my point was that it's a claim that doesn't make a lot of sense to begin with. If Allen really molested Dylan, wouldn't it have been incredibly careless of him to have then sent her off without her underpants? That doesn't sound very "artful" to me.

"CHILD MOLESTER" is a claim as well. In your opinion, it is a credible claim. In my opinion, there are strong reasons to doubt it. What if Mia Farrow is a "sick pervert" who planted a false memory of abuse in her daughter's head? In that case, aren't you a terrible person for supporting Mia Farrow and insisting that there's no way she could have ever done that when Dylan has been so traumatized by it? Shouldn't you be supporting Dylan instead of standing by the person who put that terrible thought in her brain?

I know you don't believe Mia Farrow brainwashed Dylan but the above is the logical counterpart to your line of reasoning. "Brainwashing" isn't science fiction, by the way. Many actual cases have already been cited for you (e.g. McMartin preschool). They don't use that term however.