Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kurska

(5,739 posts)
7. If you really want to compare
Tue Feb 4, 2014, 06:04 PM
Feb 2014

In the Sandusky case there was absolutely rock-solid evidence. From eye witnesses of the abuse to several different victims with limited contact with each other all giving similar accounts of what happened. There were even phone messages left for the victims where sandusky was talking about loving them.

If the quality of evidence for Sandusky's crimes existed for Woody Allen's alleged crimes, he'd be in jail. It has literally nothing to do with PR teams.

Not saying Woody Allen is innocent, not saying he didn't do something incredibly wrong. However, to say the reason Sandusky is in jail and Woody Allen isn't is because of Woody Allen has influence is asnine.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Man insists he didn't mol...»Reply #7