General Discussion

edbermac

(16,449 posts)

43. Huh? I just asked where you got that info about her being subpoened.

Reply to redqueen (Reply #42)

Wed Feb 5, 2014, 01:06 AM

Feb 2014

Were you replying to another post?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why do people keep saying "Mia defended Polanski"? [View all] redqueen Feb 2014 OP

I don't understand why it would mean anything regardless gollygee Feb 2014 #1

It's just a smear tactic. redqueen Feb 2014 #8

She is a close friend of Polanski. She did defend him in a libel suit, passionately. sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #34

Dylan, evidently, does not feel anything was resolved. The decision not to prosecute was not hers Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #38

Well, I don't know Dylan. I do know people personally who have been traumatized sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #41

I don't know Dylan and I don't need to, to understand that deep pockets of money is Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #44

If you don't know her why do you call her by her first name? I always assume sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #47

I'm suppose to call her Ms Farrow? lol. Your hostility is duly noted for wealthy abuse victims. Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #48

Well, it would falsely imply that she thought it Cha Feb 2014 #12

It would only show gollygee Feb 2014 #13

I don't know anything about that either and look forward to info. n/t Whisp Feb 2014 #2

Two simple words. blue neen Feb 2014 #3

it is cut and pasted from that shitty hit piece on Mia that so many shared a link to.... bettyellen Feb 2014 #4

It's freeperland logic, in other words. redqueen Feb 2014 #6

I can't believe, in a way, I'm defending Polanski by defending Farrow justiceischeap Feb 2014 #5

You're not, though. You're helping to correct the mendacious smearing of Mia Farrow. redqueen Feb 2014 #7

thanks for that, j Cha Feb 2014 #14

Same reason some people keep saying Woody Allen was Soon Yi's stepfather. KittyWampus Feb 2014 #9

No. One is not technically true but an understandable misstatement. redqueen Feb 2014 #10

She was 20, so not a teenager Major Nikon Feb 2014 #16

I dunno.. I saw it last night.. and thought that was Cha Feb 2014 #11

Seems there is limited information and then there are agendas...but the information we Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #20

Woody's relationship to all the females in his life has seemed "abnormally intense" Generic Other Feb 2014 #24

I was struck by what the judge found to be unreliable by the Yale team, and your observations Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #26

Thank you for this, Jefferson.. Cha Feb 2014 #25

You're quite welcome, thought it was well researched vs other incomplete info out there. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #27

Polanski sued Vanity Fair over a 2002 article that claimed he was trying to seduce a young woman El_Johns Feb 2014 #15

Polanski is a no-shit convicted child molester who druged and raped a 13 yr old girl Major Nikon Feb 2014 #21

Soooo....wait a minute ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2014 #22

I don't know how young the woman in question was supposed to be. A potential starlet. El_Johns Feb 2014 #31

Ah, I see now.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2014 #32

Why do people keep saying marrying a younger woman is analogous to pedophilia? Bonobo Feb 2014 #17

Why do people keep saying... Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #18

oh come on treestar Feb 2014 #59

Soon Yi had a father figure that wasn't Allen and considered the idea laughable Major Nikon Feb 2014 #60

Nope. Not even close. Jeff In Milwaukee Feb 2014 #62

It's partially the age difference itself Generic Other Feb 2014 #28

Married for 20 years. Bonobo Feb 2014 #29

As I stated earlier but not well Generic Other Feb 2014 #30

And I suspect that that the act of marrying Soon-Yi... Bonobo Feb 2014 #33

Nah, Allen had boundary issues and one needs to only look at the judge's opinion Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #35

I get the impression though that some seem to think it means he's innocent kcr Feb 2014 #36

Boundary issues do not make you attracted to pre-pubescents. Bonobo Feb 2014 #37

He was not able to keep boundaries, due to the nature of his urges. n/t Jefferson23 Feb 2014 #46

No. But it doesn't make it entirely unthinkable either. kcr Feb 2014 #49

He likes child-like waifish women too Generic Other Feb 2014 #52

oh come on treestar Feb 2014 #58

"nothing to do with sleeping with underage girls" Major Nikon Feb 2014 #19

True, she only defended him regarding the libel trial, however... edbermac Feb 2014 #23

You call being subpoenaed "goi(ng) out of her way to help him"? nt redqueen Feb 2014 #39

She was subpoened? Where is that information? edbermac Feb 2014 #40

Framing of her testimony aside - it's interesting that above it is cited that records were destroyed redqueen Feb 2014 #42

Huh? I just asked where you got that info about her being subpoened. edbermac Feb 2014 #43

No, your first reply to this OP was an attempt to imply her testimony was somehow meaningful. redqueen Feb 2014 #50

That's what they do. You'll never hear about that supoena. It doesn't exist. El_Johns Feb 2014 #53

Aren't you the one running around saying.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2014 #45

There won't be a response, for obvious reasons. El_Johns Feb 2014 #54

you have been here a month and you are all that in familiarity with behavior and posters. seabeyond Feb 2014 #57

In all fairness, she could have me on ignore ProudToBeBlueInRhody Feb 2014 #61

Because witnesses are subpoenaed - that's how it works. byrne Jul 2014 #63

Some of the same people say Mia has supported her molester brother, which is an outright lie. pnwmom Feb 2014 #51

Link to the estrangement? And actually, what people have been saying is that while Mia El_Johns Feb 2014 #55

I guess you missed this when you read the article: pnwmom Feb 2014 #56