Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,328 posts)
63. The courts did NOT decide there was no abuse.
Wed Feb 5, 2014, 02:00 AM
Feb 2014

The prosecutor held a press conference at which he explained that he had enough evidence to bring the case to trial, but he decided that it would be too hard on the 7 year old girl to put her through that.

The judge in the family court looked at the evidence and decided to end Woody's visitation with Dylan. He said that the Yale-New Haven report wasn't reliable.

So which court are you saying decided there was no abuse?

Dr. Diane Schetky is an associate professor of psychiatry at the University of Vermont, and the co-author of the textbook Child Sexual Abuse and co-editor of Clinical Handbook of Child Psychiatry and the Law.

http://www.andythibault.com/columns/CT%20Magazine%20-%20Apr%2097.htm

The Yale team used psychologists on Allen's payroll to make mental health conclusions. "That seems like a blatant conflict of interest; they should have excluded themselves," Schetky says.

· Custody recommendations were made even though the team never saw Allen and any of the children together. "I'd sure want that information," Schetky says.

· The team refused to interview witnesses who could have corroborated the molestation claims.

· The team destroyed its notes. "I don't know why they would," Schetky says. "They shouldn't have anything to hide, unless there's disagreement."

· Leventhal, the only medical doctor on the team, did not interview Dylan. "How can you write about someone you've never seen?" Schetky asks.

SNIP

Days later, Maco held a press conference in which he said state police had compiled enough evidence to charge Allen with a crime, but that he'd decided not to approve an arrest warrant in order to spare Dylan the trauma of a trial.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So she was 17 and he was 35 years older? dilby Feb 2014 #1
I think one of the main points is she was there at the time quinnox Feb 2014 #2
Face it, people here have made up their minds... joeybee12 Feb 2014 #4
She said this under oath, then? Why is THIS woman so credible while the adult Dylan is not, HMMMMM? WinkyDink Feb 2014 #69
yes, and she's not looking supernova Feb 2014 #3
I had college classmates who were dating profs (similar age differences.) Gormy Cuss Feb 2014 #55
Yep. Exactly. Arugula Latte Feb 2014 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #16
Bacall was 19 and Bogart was 44 progressoid Feb 2014 #22
all this stupid shit and no one says anything about the old men Mia Farrow kept marrying. CBGLuthier Feb 2014 #23
This is about Dylan Farrow and what she says happened to her, not about who Farrow pnwmom Feb 2014 #24
It's about two people who ended up in a nasty custody battle sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #61
The courts did NOT decide there was no abuse. pnwmom Feb 2014 #63
Because it didn't even get that far. Look, I'm really not interested in this anymore. sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #64
Nope, still gross. Starry Messenger Feb 2014 #5
Does Nelkin have a daughter? Xyzse Feb 2014 #6
dunno, but she is in her 50s now, and she seems fine with what she did, dating Allen, a much older quinnox Feb 2014 #7
There is something called Stockholm syndrome as well. Xyzse Feb 2014 #9
Oh, good Lord! n/t Comrade Grumpy Feb 2014 #10
It was a 24 age gap, less than the 30 year age gap between Farrow & Sinatra -- whom she El_Johns Feb 2014 #42
She isn't in her 50s gollygee Feb 2014 #31
She's 55. Woody Allen is 79. 24-year difference. El_Johns Feb 2014 #36
Oh ok well that's different than what's in the OP gollygee Feb 2014 #37
say what? no, under 18 is not necessarily considered "another type of rape" cali Feb 2014 #12
It is called statutory rape. Xyzse Feb 2014 #15
Which state? JJChambers Feb 2014 #29
These ones. Xyzse Feb 2014 #30
California Starry Messenger Feb 2014 #32
the problem with hunt was the disgusting web of lies she and her parents pushed. cali Feb 2014 #70
wow, well, if under 18 is rape, then a lot of teenage boys are guilty quinnox Feb 2014 #13
That isn't the point. Xyzse Feb 2014 #17
Oh. Well. That makes it okay then. blue neen Feb 2014 #33
No, actually I think the issue in this case is a whole bunch of bored screechy people looking for sibelian Feb 2014 #66
You would do well to look at some statutory rape statues BainsBane Feb 2014 #72
Age of consent in NY is currently 17 mathematic Feb 2014 #14
Thanks for the correction. Xyzse Feb 2014 #19
it used to be 18 in NY, not sure when it got lowered. I think in the 70's . bettyellen Feb 2014 #48
Not in New York. former9thward Feb 2014 #28
so anyone who is dating anyone knows Whisp Feb 2014 #11
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #18
Mia Farrow is also a close friend of Roman Polanski, she has defended him in court sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #20
She's upset about child abuse of HER OWN CHILD gollygee Feb 2014 #43
I'm upset about all child abuse. And would not be going to court to defend someone sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #60
That all has nothing to do with whether gollygee Feb 2014 #71
Or the 71-year-old Sinatra with 41-year-old Farrow -- since Farrow has already admitted she El_Johns Feb 2014 #38
Frank Sinatra was an adult. Mia Farrow was an adult. blue neen Feb 2014 #53
So was Nelkin, 17 being the age of consent in NY. Doesn't stop numerous posters from commenting El_Johns Feb 2014 #59
"said Nelkin, who first met Allen on the set of the film “Manhattan."" redqueen Feb 2014 #21
Sounds like a man afraid of being challenged justiceischeap Feb 2014 #26
Whoever wrote that is mistaken. Their relationship began in 1976, when she was 17. At 18, El_Johns Feb 2014 #39
Who wants to think they might have dated a pervert? n/t pnwmom Feb 2014 #25
The accusations did NOT come on the "heels of a custody battle." BainsBane Feb 2014 #27
Well, she was there at the time, and in contact with Allen quinnox Feb 2014 #35
This woman just changed her story live on camera, but you're taking her word as credible redqueen Feb 2014 #41
Maybe she had a false memory gollygee Feb 2014 #44
The amount of mental gymnastics people are engaging in in order to defend Allen is fucking sickening redqueen Feb 2014 #46
I just watched the CNN interview, she seems credible to me quinnox Feb 2014 #47
... redqueen Feb 2014 #49
This message was self-deleted by its author quinnox Feb 2014 #50
I just read the transcript, and I wouldn't say she "changed her story" because of that quinnox Feb 2014 #54
It's a detail that makes a difference between a relationship and a felony by Woody Allen BainsBane Feb 2014 #62
Transcript is here: edbermac Feb 2014 #57
I don't believe that. BainsBane Feb 2014 #51
Do your exes know about your life now to that degree? Gormy Cuss Feb 2014 #58
Jerry Seinfeld 1000words Feb 2014 #34
Why don't you just come over here and shoot me dead. rgbecker Feb 2014 #40
I doubt she'll be accused of harboring false memories of her youth... LanternWaste Feb 2014 #45
President Grover Cleveland married a woman 27 years his junior in the White House kskiska Feb 2014 #52
Just a short 23 years after the Emancipation Proclamation was signed. redqueen Feb 2014 #56
Why would anyone date him, especially teens? treestar Feb 2014 #65
Because he's a sex god. Frank Cannon Feb 2014 #67
Who cares who "vouches" for WA? Do people expect pedophiles to be so in public? WinkyDink Feb 2014 #68
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Former girlfriend of Wood...»Reply #63