General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some people found homosexuality so objectionable and "creepy" that... [View all]You have concluded that Allen is a pedophile and that makes it easier for you to establish in your mind that he likely had an incestuous relationship with Soon-Yi since she was a child.
It is circular reasoning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning
Circular reasoning (Latin: circulus in probando, "circle in proving"; also known as paradoxical thinking or circular logic) is a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with. The components of a circular argument are often logically valid because if the premises are true, the conclusion must be true. However, the argument is useless because the conclusion is one of the premises. Circular logic cannot prove a conclusion because, if the conclusion is doubted, the premise which leads to it will also be doubted. Begging the question is a form of circular reasoning.
Having already concluded that Allen is most likely guilty of pedophilia, you conclude that his relationship with Soon-Yi is based upon such pedophiliac behavior (starting at age 10 you suggest though NOWHERE have I reads any suggestion that this may be the case or that anyone has brought up the specter of molestation of Soon-Yi that I have seen).
Interesting the rush to believe the recycled memories of a 7 year old, but no desire to respect the memories and judgment of Soon-Yi, a 10 year old then, and now an adult who speaks multiple languages and has her own children.