Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
2. Here is the crux of the issue
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 08:45 AM
Mar 2012

because the insurance companies want the mandate. Without it they are forced to cover people who wait until they need insurance to buy insurance.

As the article says, they will need to pass a new law which repeals those two portions of the reform. This seems unlikely to me. I don't see how they get 60 in the Senate and I doubt Pres. Obama (assuming he wins a second term) signs it even if they did.


If we assume that the mandate is overturned as a stand alone clause and no law can be passed and signed to repeal those portions of the reform then where are we?

The insurance companies will want some kind of waiting period between when people purchase insurance and when they can start to be payed benefits. Evan that doesn't solve their problem and again there is no guarantee it will be passed.

I think once the insurance companies are properly screwed then they will demand that "Big Government" steps in to cover these people and their lapdog (R)s will take up the cause. IMO this is the only viable path to the public option that we should have had in the first place. It is going to take some doing to get there but the possibility still exists.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Health Insurers: We'll Pu...»Reply #2