Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Boojatta

(12,231 posts)
7. I am willing to assume, for the sake
Tue Mar 20, 2012, 09:40 AM
Mar 2012

of argument, that an individual person cannot make a positive contribution to solving or even defining a political problem unless the individual has a political ideology. I don't believe that, but I am willing to assume it for the sake of argument.

(I suspect that we may have different and conflicting ideas in mind associated with the words "political ideology" so that perhaps there is no substantive difference of opinion here. Perhaps an example would be helpful if you can think of one.)

However, I have described a kind of political organization that perhaps already exists or perhaps could exist, and the organization itself might consist of members who define and solve political problems even though the organization itself may have no stance on any topic of political ideology. This should be clear if you can imagine a government having no official doctrines on questions of theology even though many of its employees may be strong atheists or devout theists.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Let's start an after-school club to do stuff. We'll call it The After School Club. Ian David Mar 2012 #1
Political problems are not soluble. It's that simple. REAL politics is the art of compromise... saras Mar 2012 #2
"If political ideology provides techniques for solving political problems" - I don't think it does muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #3
You asserted that there's a fundamental difference. Boojatta Mar 2012 #9
The difference is some see it as a problem, and some as desirable muriel_volestrangler Mar 2012 #10
The fundamental difference is that any possible solutions are mutually exclusive. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #12
The questions not being asked alferoutou Mar 2012 #4
One person's "political problem" is another person's greatly desired situation. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #5
What if you are in the funeral business? Boojatta Mar 2012 #8
How can you solve or even define a political problem if you don't have an ideology? Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #6
I am willing to assume, for the sake Boojatta Mar 2012 #7
Our government has fairly strong separation of religion and state and still many laws Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #13
I think it would be impossible to find a population which is devoid of political leanings because Happyhippychick Mar 2012 #16
The "How" of solving a political problem is very important Ohio Joe Mar 2012 #11
I'd say that the how is the only important thing. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #14
I disagree with Skinner too, most political parties exist to seize and hold power. bemildred Mar 2012 #15
Non-partisan political parties is like a barbecue contest where flavor is banned. Zalatix Mar 2012 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I'm making this post by S...»Reply #7