Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2naSalit

(102,868 posts)
15. Did he enter that?
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 02:46 AM
Feb 2014

and when was it entered?



ETA: Oh, you're saying that I should comment on his facebook... I don't do facebook or twitter. I did send an email before he started his parade this week. I complained about his interview with Brina Schweitzer the oil shill from Montana, my home state, and called him out for the content of the conversation which seemed like an ad for the pipeline delivered by Schweitzer.

Then he started this week-long tirade. I am glad he at least dares to have the counter arguments on the show that he has but he doesn't let them say much. Josh Fox was the only one who called him out on his reliance on the DOS report and where it originated, for which he was cut off.

And, I have been posting this all over kingdom come:

There is a public comment period that lasts only 30 DAYS!! STARTS TODAY!!! (2/5/14)

http://www.keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/

A 30-day public comment period begins on February 5, 2014 and will close on March 7, 2014. During this period, members of the public and other interested parties are encouraged to submit comments on the national interest determination to

http://www.regulations.gov

Comments are not private and will be made public. Comments may also be mailed directly to:

U.S. Department of State
Bureau of Energy Resources, Room 4843
Attn: Keystone XL Public Comments
2201 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20520

Direct link to comment page:

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=DOS-2014-0003-0001


Go for it, 30 days isn't much.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

you can contact MSNBC snooper2 Feb 2014 #1
Ignorant, maybe, elleng Feb 2014 #2
Yeah, he is worried about deaths from rail accidents in the U.S. greatlaurel Feb 2014 #8
Those who ignore 'environmental justice' are not, imo, elleng Feb 2014 #10
I have to very politely agree to disagree with you on this. greatlaurel Feb 2014 #35
Thanks elleng Feb 2014 #41
I Thought At One Time Ed Spoke Out Against It..... global1 Feb 2014 #3
I did too. greatlaurel Feb 2014 #32
Well, if he criticized it, management would just make him apologize for it tularetom Feb 2014 #4
Ha! greatlaurel Feb 2014 #36
Radical environmentalists, are we? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #5
Thanks greatlaurel Feb 2014 #9
heh RobertEarl Feb 2014 #11
You have it in a nutshell. greatlaurel Feb 2014 #31
I like Ed, Jamaal510 Feb 2014 #6
For Ed it suddenly became a safety 2naSalit Feb 2014 #7
Yes, he doesn't convince me he seems to be going against type flamingdem Feb 2014 #13
I liled Ed, too. I am very pro-uniom greatlaurel Feb 2014 #14
Good points! nt 2naSalit Feb 2014 #16
Comment on His facebook page. bravenak Feb 2014 #12
Did he enter that? 2naSalit Feb 2014 #15
Thanks for the information! greatlaurel Feb 2014 #29
For certain! 2naSalit Feb 2014 #42
I watched him open-mouthed fadedrose Feb 2014 #17
"Prostituted"? You think he took money? Really? Hekate Feb 2014 #18
Pipeline safety is sich a big lie, too greatlaurel Feb 2014 #19
he is from North Dakota, which will benefit from the pipeline. fill in the blanks nt msongs Feb 2014 #20
That explains why he keeps talking about the Bakken oil. greatlaurel Feb 2014 #30
This is when I wrote off Ed Schultz as a bloviating hawk: delrem Feb 2014 #21
Prostituting. +1 blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #22
ED's A Cheer leader imthevicar Feb 2014 #23
No, he isn't .. in fact that's when he's real popular around here is when Cha Feb 2014 #24
Oh How a Good Paying Gig Will change you! imthevicar Feb 2014 #26
The viewpoints about the mainstream polynomial Feb 2014 #25
I'm through with Ed newfie11 Feb 2014 #27
His position can be understood..... Swede Atlanta Feb 2014 #28
Just one minor problem with your thinking ... GeorgeGist Feb 2014 #43
Oh Scumbag Ed. NuclearDem Feb 2014 #33
This is what happens when we allow ourselves to be led by "ex" freepers... Romulox Feb 2014 #34
Did not know that about him. greatlaurel Feb 2014 #37
This is the same guy that was very anti-OWS, until the stream of very intelligent bullwinkle428 Feb 2014 #38
Ed is a person, not a political litmus test for the left Tom Rinaldo Feb 2014 #39
I don't watch him because he sits in a Non Union shop claiming to be pro Union. Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #40
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ed Schultz on MSNBC has l...»Reply #15