Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(1,805 posts)

9. No, you haven't. By not voting you just limit the pool from which A or B are selected. By voting

Thu Feb 6, 2014, 04:45 AM

Feb 2014

for "none of the above" you are voting for C, & thus creating a situation where C can win over A and B.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

New Hampshire House bill would let you vote for 'none of the above' [View all] WilliamPitt Feb 2014 OP

Holding elections is expensive frazzled Feb 2014 #1

This would be awesome Riftaxe Feb 2014 #2

Big fan of this idea! 1000words Feb 2014 #3

Nevada has had this for years. Jim Lane Feb 2014 #6

Meh. It's a plank of the Libertarian platform, which gives me pause Recursion Feb 2014 #7

seems lazy to me JI7 Feb 2014 #10