What's really relevant in the Dylan Farrow molestation case

[pnwmom]

90. I don't know what you're getting at. The point is that he had the home study of Ronan and Dylan

waived. What difference would it make if there were two adoptions or one?

But this paragraph from the same article you just linked to says "the children" were adopted on Dec. 17 -- the day you just pointed to on which Moses was adopted. So they all 3 were adopted the same day.

Concerning Mia, yes, I agree she is to blame, too. All the warning flags were waving and she was ignoring them, trying to keep things going with Woody. So if Dylan is right about what happened, then for some period of time, Mia was an enabler.

http://www.vanityfair.com/magazine/archive/1992/11/farrow199211

"Given the status of the father, the home study was waived, and the court presumably knew nothing about Woody’s sessions with Dr. Coates. “You have a home visit when you’re thinking maybe these people can’t afford another child. Here there was no issue of morality or finances,” Weltz says. “Woody had told me that he used to go over to Mia’s apartment every day and be there when the children woke up. He’d see them every day in the middle of the day. He’d be there when they went to bed. On the surface it seemed that he was more of a father than a lot of natural fathers I represent.” Weltz recalls December 17, the day Woody, Mia, and the children accompanied him to the courtroom (where Woody remembered he had once shot a scene) and the judge’s chambers, as being “probably the happiest day I’ve ever spent in court.”