Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
12. About $200 billion, but if you don't think FDR's actions are relevant to today,
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 08:24 AM
Feb 2014

why do you want to know about the 1933 bank bailout cost?

Oh what the heck:

Besides deposit insurance and a banking act that controlled competition and interest rates, Roosevelt drastically enlarged and expanded the role of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, which was established in 1932.

The agency made loans to troubled banks, and seized and sold off distressed assets at others. After government inspections, many small banks never reopened, with more than 4,000 closed in 1933. The agency also bought stock in 6,000 banks, at a cost of $1.3 billion. In proportion to today’s economy, the program would amount to about $200 billion.

To insure an adequate supply of currency, the Act provided for the issuance of Federal Reserve Notes.... After the Act was signed into law, the Bureau of Engraving and Printing promptly went into 24-hour production to manufacture the currency....

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/27/business/economy/27fdr.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

The other programs he put in place to help Main Street sure didn't apply now.

Not sure exactly what you mean. Much of 'the other programs he put in place' have been repealed so they cannot help 'now'. Are you saying that or that they would not help if there were still in effect?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

To bad we didn't. newfie11 Feb 2014 #1
let them fail , let them fail ! leftyohiolib Feb 2014 #2
It's fascinating when people suggest that the US can't do such a thing solarhydrocan Feb 2014 #3
of course the US could do such a thing BelgianMadCow Feb 2014 #4
We could, but FDR chose not to. pampango Feb 2014 #8
How much bailout money did FDR and the FED give banks in the 1930s? merrily Feb 2014 #9
About $200 billion, but if you don't think FDR's actions are relevant to today, pampango Feb 2014 #12
the problem as to why the US can't do it, is very simple... Javaman Feb 2014 #18
+1 liberal_at_heart Feb 2014 #22
Yes that is how you deal with corruption florida08 Feb 2014 #5
I think we are in for another 'adjustment' soon Ichingcarpenter Feb 2014 #6
Even after all Bernanke's help? They must be idiots, then. merrily Feb 2014 #10
k/r marmar Feb 2014 #7
Let the banks fail. SamKnause Feb 2014 #11
The banks are to blame dreamnightwind Feb 2014 #14
The politicians are to BLAME !!! SamKnause Feb 2014 #17
They ARE bought and paid for dreamnightwind Feb 2014 #19
Owned SamKnause Feb 2014 #20
Allowing the banks to fail here would have had a very interesting outcoume... Javaman Feb 2014 #23
I mostly agree dreamnightwind Feb 2014 #25
TPTB don't want 2% unemployment here durablend Feb 2014 #13
Exactly dreamnightwind Feb 2014 #16
neither do they want a decent labor market here in Europe BelgianMadCow Feb 2014 #24
Its a good mantra and we should learn the words to it. marble falls Feb 2014 #15
Banksters will never fail, they bought enough politicians now to make Rex Feb 2014 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let Banks Fail Is Iceland...»Reply #12