General Discussion

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)

74. Cant you make a statement? You guys seem to rely on pictures. Do you deny

Reply to VanillaRhapsody (Reply #29)

Thu Feb 6, 2014, 12:15 PM

Feb 2014

that Obama has appointed a shit load of conservatives?

The status quo is killing us and some seem oblivious.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

93 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

It's Elizabeth Warren's Party. Barack Obama Is Just Living in It. [View all] kpete Feb 2014 OP

Yeah, sure. frazzled Feb 2014 #1

+1 PennsylvaniaMatt Feb 2014 #25

oh yes, now its time to smear her. goody goody Armstead Feb 2014 #63

Yeah, and Reagan was liberal Democrat before .. ananda Feb 2014 #69

I voted for Bush in 2000, also. Yet, closeupready Feb 2014 #75

So many ways to write an article like this without making it crap. NCTraveler Feb 2014 #92

Adam Green. LOL... SidDithers Feb 2014 #2

that shit should be illegal joshcryer Feb 2014 #4

'Zactly what I said in fewer words, downthread.. Thank Cha Feb 2014 #14

PCCC is one of the most effective PROGRESSIVE DEMOCRATIC Organizations around today. I will sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #18

Then I hope you donate lots and lots of money to PCCC... SidDithers Feb 2014 #20

Their website is awesome. For the work they do for Progressive Democratic causes sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #23

ROFL... SidDithers Feb 2014 #47

Thanks. Always happy to keep you informed about exciting Progressive Democratic news. sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #51

And I'm happy to inform everyone else how wrong you are... SidDithers Feb 2014 #53

LOL! Now that is funny. Considering that most DUers are full supporters of PCCC. But knock yourself sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #60

"most DUers are full supporters of PCCC"... SidDithers Feb 2014 #64

I absolutely loved what PCCC did to expose a Dem's alliance to the Third Way 'think tank'. sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #76

Which has nothing to do with your ridiculous, unverifiable claim...nt SidDithers Feb 2014 #80

Your ridiculous claim that ONLY Liberal activist groups should not have money sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #89

No. Try to focus. Your Gish Gallop won't work with me... SidDithers Feb 2014 #93

AFAIK, most politicians, etc. are doing a great job of putting money in rich people's pockets. merrily Feb 2014 #22

+ struggle4progress Feb 2014 #50

ah, another poutrage profiteer... along the lines of greenwald and hamsher... dionysus Feb 2014 #87

Whatthefuckever BeyondGeography Feb 2014 #3

Prediction: ProSense Feb 2014 #5

Festival of lies might be a little strong. But I would hope you agree that it rhett o rick Feb 2014 #8

Don't "hope" ProSense Feb 2014 #9

Do you know what rhetoric is? rhett o rick Feb 2014 #67

Only studied the logical fallacies chapter bobduca Feb 2014 #71

And there you are with the big 'ol Elizabeth Warren on your sig VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #28

Ahh the ROLF Group where loyalty means more than principles. nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #70

Principles...right sure you do.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #85

And, .. Cha Feb 2014 #16

Clickbait headline ProSense Feb 2014 #17

I have a problem with this statement: "What's changed? Part of it is that Obama finally realized rhett o rick Feb 2014 #6

This is ProSense Feb 2014 #10

Not that you will respond with a straight answer, but " the question still stands, why does Pres rhett o rick Feb 2014 #13

"Embracing Conservatives" my Great Aunt Fanny! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #29

Cant you make a statement? You guys seem to rely on pictures. Do you deny rhett o rick Feb 2014 #74

That picture is worth a THOUSAND words.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #84

No this is your status quo that you are so proud of. rhett o rick Feb 2014 #86

So who YOU got that can fix all that overnight? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #88

So your changing your argument from "the status quo is just all right with me" to "we are helpless rhett o rick Feb 2014 #90

that was never MY argument...that was the words YOU decided to put into my mouth... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #91

Way before his inauguration. merrily Feb 2014 #24

And I am about to laugh my ass off at this assertion that he is not....see here: VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #31

I don't know which of us will laugh harder. Everything is relative. merrily Feb 2014 #35

Go see for yourself....the issues are all laid out for you right there VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #37

A GIF with comic sans wins the internet today! bobduca Feb 2014 #78

Yeah.....you got something else that puts EVERY vote and EVERY statemen VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #82

+1000!!1!!11!! RC Feb 2014 #79

Obama "finally realized"??? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #83

It's about Obama knowing what to do with timing Whisp Feb 2014 #7

Yeah, Adam Green has come up with Cha Feb 2014 #12

Such as? PCCC is a wonderful, PROGRESSIVE organization and extremely effective. sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #21

Bullshit.. Adam Green is a divisive profiteer.. Cha Feb 2014 #11

You must have missed my question. What 'bs' has Green been up to other than promoting Progressive sabrina 1 Feb 2014 #61

Uh-oh. 11-dimensional chess dictates that the Party bends for Obama, and not the other way around. blkmusclmachine Feb 2014 #15

Oh you think so...who is bending? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #32

"President Obama is basically taking steps to sound more and more like Elizabeth Warren" = bullshit phleshdef Feb 2014 #19

Yea, but Putn made Obama put Warren in that position ... he didn't really want to do it. JoePhilly Feb 2014 #65

He's talked it.. sendero Feb 2014 #66

LMAO - Does anyone actually buy this? stevenleser Feb 2014 #26

What difference would it make if they were buying it? merrily Feb 2014 #30

Why is this even Obama vs. Warren? They're not running against each other. merrily Feb 2014 #27

Some seem to hilariously think so! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #33

Well the writer of the article does, but merrily Feb 2014 #36

I certainly don't.....but for some I am not so sure! VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #38

Just to clarify, by writer of the article, I meant the National Journal writer, not merrily Feb 2014 #42

and??? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #43

I simply did not want my statement to be construed as merrily Feb 2014 #52

okay.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #55

BTW, editor in chief of the National Journal is Ron Fournier. merrily Feb 2014 #39

and that means what? VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #40

It means nothing good. merrily Feb 2014 #44

I never gave it any credibility from the start no matter who wrote it... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #46

No matter where it appeared, it stands on its own. merrily Feb 2014 #56

okay.... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #58

Okay.... merrily Feb 2014 #59

Because progressives think they tear down the President and still win... Drunken Irishman Feb 2014 #54

Tearing down the President, as you put it, is very different from this, though. merrily Feb 2014 #57

Wow you sure pissed off the faithful! Rex Feb 2014 #34

LOL bobduca Feb 2014 #68

People need to quit using Elizabeth Warren to divide Democrats treestar Feb 2014 #41

they need to quit trying to divide us period...its unproductive... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #48

Exactly frazzled Feb 2014 #77

I love Sen. Elizabeth Warren but I would not vote to make her President underthematrix Feb 2014 #45

I would. Rex Feb 2014 #49

She's already said she's not interested. longship Feb 2014 #62

Let me ProSense Feb 2014 #72

My guess is he may find himself in an all-to-familiar dilemma Armstead Feb 2014 #81

Can't we just say?? mstinamotorcity2 Feb 2014 #73