Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
53. I disagree. I don't at all admire people who are Dominants. Christie and Republican
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 12:36 PM
Feb 2014

bullying come to mind. I think they are mostly weak. And even though not an avid fan of PBO or Hillary, I voted for him and have cheered him on many, many things. I'm way to the Left of all of them, apparently.

But the Superbowl...he felt he needed the stage of the Super Bowl to elevate his status as President, in a schoolyard fight with a Known Bully? No. What would have been appropriate to his office would have been to have his family bundled up as non-partisan fans in the crowd, shivering and eating popcorn or whatever...and he would have gotten a lot of family friendly poses and approving publicity from the cameras on all the stations. Hell, Fox wouldn't have even shown his face, they detest him so much.

He has done that to great success on many occasions...the selfies and all are so cute...as is the warmth of his family. Frankly, that's how most Americans want to see him...an average guy with a great family who represents himself and us well on the national and global stage. Because of his race, it has been a much more difficult battle, but I feel he has broken through that bigotry and done us proud...for the most part.

I don't need your snark that "I didn't get it". I got it. I just have a different opinion. To we Liberals, different opinions are OK and don't reflect deficient or obtuse thinking. It was a cheap publicity trick...and it should have been better thought out. At least an MSNBC interviewer, then let Fox and their Right Haters scream to high heaven. They do anyway.

We don't want him to even like Bill O'Reilly, (or Huckabee/Sugar Daddy/women's libido or Hannity or Beck...) let alone present himself in O'Reilly's Special Fox Den-Receiving Room. They and their ilk are offensive to our sensibilities. He made us watch O'Reilly and that was upsetting. In fact, I turned it off shortly in disgust after it started. Perhaps he did better later on.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why indeed. n/t Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #1
O'Reilly yeoman6987 Feb 2014 #52
Hubris and arrogance n2doc Feb 2014 #2
How about 'confidence' and 'composure'? randome Feb 2014 #4
seriously? you can't possibly believe that. wait, you can. cali Feb 2014 #20
Oh you would think "hubris and arrogance".. which is totally Cha Feb 2014 #37
Really? A former General was on there talking about armed revolution cprise Feb 2014 #56
Remember Obama with Rick Warren in 2008? Jerry442 Feb 2014 #3
The Sally Fields of politicians. gLibDem Feb 2014 #16
I'm using that. DeSwiss Feb 2014 #25
I'm honored gLibDem Feb 2014 #35
I doubt it very much. Do you really think the President is stupid? Do you really think everything El_Johns Feb 2014 #40
No, I don't think Sally Fields was stupid. gLibDem Feb 2014 #47
Chuck Todd, "...not our job..." that's why, the M$M isn't illuminating their lies uponit7771 Feb 2014 #5
Thank you, uponit.. that why he did it to get the word out if Cha Feb 2014 #38
The Democrat Party and it's leadership heaven05 Feb 2014 #6
K&R G_j Feb 2014 #7
They're threatening revolution cprise Feb 2014 #8
"This time, I *know* they'll finally realize I'm a man they can do business with." MannyGoldstein Feb 2014 #9
Because O'Reilly paid for it would be my guess. OnyxCollie Feb 2014 #10
Well, that would be more than cynical, more than sick Demeter Feb 2014 #28
All the more significant a ret. general appears on Fox cprise Feb 2014 #36
Murdoch, doncha mean. Big supporter of education "reform". El_Johns Feb 2014 #41
Why did we watch the superbowl at all, given it was conveyed to us by and massively profited Fox? AtheistCrusader Feb 2014 #11
I too found it disturbing packman Feb 2014 #12
Because no politician can resist appearing before tens of millions of registered voters NewJeffCT Feb 2014 #13
well, 99% of them, anyway. I think yours is the most likely reason. cali Feb 2014 #21
More like Roger Ailes paid for it. IggleDoer Feb 2014 #14
both sides benefit from the fake scandals Enrique Feb 2014 #15
^^^^THIS^^^^ bvar22 Feb 2014 #27
+1 El_Johns Feb 2014 #42
Why preach to the choir notemason Feb 2014 #17
You've GOT to be kidding durablend Feb 2014 #19
uh, this wasn't the choir or not the choir. Fox carried the Superbowl cali Feb 2014 #22
Why? Perhaps...just perhaps Android3.14 Feb 2014 #18
If a Fox News person had to do the interview, I'd pick Shep MrScorpio Feb 2014 #23
With All Due Respect mrchips Feb 2014 #24
Excuse me! I will pay attention to you, mrchips.. Cha Feb 2014 #45
Spot on, mrchips. n/t sheshe2 Feb 2014 #50
Agree, but Obama made a fool of Bill-O and set in stone Bill-O's and Fox's idiotic witch trial. Coyotl Feb 2014 #26
O'reilly is all up in arms about criticism of his interview.. Cha Feb 2014 #46
He's probably losing sleep over this. Reality strikes home when your on the mat hearing the count. Coyotl Feb 2014 #48
One thing I didn't do and one I ddn't know DFW Feb 2014 #29
If Obama is serious about talking to those of us who spent the hours and hours and hours of JDPriestly Feb 2014 #30
I think it was a wash. progressoid Feb 2014 #31
Because it looks like he is trying to avoid the questions? treestar Feb 2014 #32
There's the ODS way of looking at this and Cha Feb 2014 #39
PBO doesn't get it...made me ill to see him grovel, on global TV, to even agree to such a thing libdem4life Feb 2014 #33
Newsflash.. President Obama wasn't "groveling".. You're the Cha Feb 2014 #43
I disagree. I don't at all admire people who are Dominants. Christie and Republican libdem4life Feb 2014 #53
Why??? DeSwiss Feb 2014 #34
O'Reilly Unloads On 'Weasel,' 'Beneath Contempt' WaPo Columnist Dana Milbank Cha Feb 2014 #44
I loved the interview kpete Feb 2014 #49
thanks kpete Cha Feb 2014 #55
I couldn't care less about Dana Milbank but Billo calling himself a "journalist"? Boomerproud Feb 2014 #51
I know huh?! And, he's on a "jihad" for journalist Cha Feb 2014 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Juan Cole: The Cheapening...»Reply #53