General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The President is NOT the Only Person We Elect! [View all]MineralMan
(151,273 posts)A lot of what passes for activism in the USA is negative in nature. Positive activism is less well publicized. Working to find and get good candidates on the ballot is positive activism. Working to get people to the polls and convince them that voting for the most progressive candidate who can win is positive activism.
Negative activism is encouraging people not to go to the polls, and not to elect candidates who represent the best candidate who can win the election. That kind of activism benefits the other side every time.
I'm in favor of positive activism that results in progress toward progressive ideals, even when those ideals are not completely met by every person who is elected. I've never met a single candidate who agreed with my positions on everything. Never. I never expect to, either. So, I'm always working to elect someone who may not agree with me in all areas. That's reality.
Positive activism is also communicating with those who are elected to try to convince them of what you find important. That's positive activism, and it's aided when your other activism helped those people get elected.