Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Smug creationists hold up signs mocking science. [View all]pokerfan
(27,677 posts)80. Answers for Creationists (Phil Plait)

1) Bill Nye, are you influencing the minds of children in a positive way?
Im not Bill, but Id say yes, he is. More than just giving them facts to memorize, he is showing them how science works. Not only that, his clear love and enthusiasm for science is infectious, and that to me is his greatest gift.
2) Are you scared of a Divine Creator?
No. In fact, if there is a Judeo-Christian god, that would have fascinating implications for much of what we scientists study, and would be a rich vein to mine. Perhaps a more pertinent question is, Are you scared there might not be a Divine Creator? There is more room for a god in science than there is for no god in religious faith.
3) Is it completely illogical that the Earth was created mature? i.e. trees created with rings Adam created as an adult ....
It might be internally consistent, even logical, but a bit of a stretch. After all, we can posit that God created the Universe last Thursday, looking exactly as it is, with all evidence pointing to it being old and your memories implanted such that you think youre older than a mere few days. Consistent, sure, but plausible? Not really.
4) Does not the second law of thermodynamics disprove evolution?
No. The creationist argument assumes the Earth is a closed system, such that energy cannot escape or enter. But the Sun is the main source of energy for the Earth. This allows more order to be created, and for entropy to be locally lowered in some cases.
Read the rest: http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/02/06/religion_and_science_answering_creationists_questions.html
Im not Bill, but Id say yes, he is. More than just giving them facts to memorize, he is showing them how science works. Not only that, his clear love and enthusiasm for science is infectious, and that to me is his greatest gift.
2) Are you scared of a Divine Creator?
No. In fact, if there is a Judeo-Christian god, that would have fascinating implications for much of what we scientists study, and would be a rich vein to mine. Perhaps a more pertinent question is, Are you scared there might not be a Divine Creator? There is more room for a god in science than there is for no god in religious faith.
3) Is it completely illogical that the Earth was created mature? i.e. trees created with rings Adam created as an adult ....
It might be internally consistent, even logical, but a bit of a stretch. After all, we can posit that God created the Universe last Thursday, looking exactly as it is, with all evidence pointing to it being old and your memories implanted such that you think youre older than a mere few days. Consistent, sure, but plausible? Not really.
4) Does not the second law of thermodynamics disprove evolution?
No. The creationist argument assumes the Earth is a closed system, such that energy cannot escape or enter. But the Sun is the main source of energy for the Earth. This allows more order to be created, and for entropy to be locally lowered in some cases.
Read the rest: http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/02/06/religion_and_science_answering_creationists_questions.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Poe's law, YEC creationists are actually this ignorant, and these are all common arguments...
Humanist_Activist
Feb 2014
#36
I use to laugh this stuff off, but it seems to be getting worse...children in public schools
Jefferson23
Feb 2014
#6
All four...see, is that not an increase to represent their growing constituents
Jefferson23
Feb 2014
#18
Nice job. Not to quibble but sunsets happen because the earth is a sphere rotating on its axis.
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2014
#35
Also the colors that appear at sunset are due to the refraction/reflection of the atmosphere..
Humanist_Activist
Feb 2014
#39
It's funny because the god caused big bang theory hypothesis has also been treated with very little
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2014
#38
I don't think most believers believe in talking donkeys, talking snakes, and talking bushes
Major Nikon
Feb 2014
#78
Somebody doesn't know what a theory is. Perhaps a few more science classes are in order.
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2014
#33
I love it when they do the little bunny foo-foo thing around the word "Theory"
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2014
#37
BREAKING: People who reject science turn out to be bad at scientific thought.
cthulu2016
Feb 2014
#40
These people are poster children for the sorry state of our educational system.
surrealAmerican
Feb 2014
#49