Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
6. Ocean water off La Jolla coast being monitored (and not) for Fukushima radiation
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 04:39 PM
Feb 2014

By Pat Sherman
La Jolla Light, Feb. 4, 2014

EXCERPT...

In 2011 Thiemens and a crew of UCSD atmospheric chemists reported the first quantitative measurement of the amount of radiation leaked from the damaged nuclear reactor in Fukushima, following the devastating earthquake and tsunami there.

Their estimate was based on radioactive sulfur that wafted across the Pacific Ocean after operators of the damaged reactor had to cool overheated fuel with seawater — causing a chemical reaction between byproducts of nuclear fission and chlorine ions in the saltwater.

Thiemens has, for the past several years, unsuccessfully sought to obtain grant funding to follow-up his research, first reported on Aug. 15 2011 in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

However, he said neither the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency, California Air Resources Board or National Academy of Sciences (of which he is a member) were interested in funding additional research to measure the Fukushima fallout.

“It’s probably one of these things that just fell through the cracks,” Thiemens said. “It doesn’t quite fall under classical (research criteria).”

CONTINUED...

http://www.lajollalight.com/2014/02/04/ocean-water-off-la-jolla-coast-being-monitored-for-fukushima-radiation/

I wonder what they do consider legitimate research when a respected scientist and a dean at a major research university can't get funding to investigate radiation from Fukushima.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

That is so wonderful! ananda Feb 2014 #1
So I followed your link that is linked to the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution snooper2 Feb 2014 #2
Apparently not as radioactive as some are claiming. longship Feb 2014 #3
You making things up yet again RE? FBaggins Feb 2014 #4
Oh, it's there RobertEarl Feb 2014 #11
A simple "yes... I'm making it up" would do FBaggins Feb 2014 #12
Yes it is RobertEarl Feb 2014 #13
I have... in fact I posted it already FBaggins Feb 2014 #14
Oh, you need help? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #15
2011? FBaggins Feb 2014 #18
That's what I wrote earlier RobertEarl Feb 2014 #20
... SidDithers Feb 2014 #5
Ocean water off La Jolla coast being monitored (and not) for Fukushima radiation Octafish Feb 2014 #6
Indeed RobertEarl Feb 2014 #7
If researchers can't get funding for Fukushima, it must mean there's nothing to worry about. Octafish Feb 2014 #8
No one needs to make it seem worse than it is RobertEarl Feb 2014 #10
Check out this chili recipe zappaman Feb 2014 #9
I think the SOP of GD should be updated to include the phrase "No (deliberate) misinformation". Vashta Nerada Feb 2014 #16
You? Again? RobertEarl Feb 2014 #17
Abso-fucking-lutely... SidDithers Feb 2014 #21
That's not true RobertEarl Feb 2014 #22
From the site RobertEarl Feb 2014 #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Scientists in mad scrambl...»Reply #6