Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Elizabeth Warren To Obama: Stop Nominating So Many Corporatists [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)16. Does
"that's why this thread lives and yours dies."
...that change the facts? I can deal with all of Senator Warren's comments, not just the selective quotes. Can you?
Senator Warren Urges Greater Professional Diversity on Federal Bench
Cites New Report on Corporate Lawyer Dominance of Federal Judiciary, Calls for More Nominees With Broad Legal Experience
Washington, DC - United States Senator Elizabeth Warren delivered remarks today on "Broadening the Bench: Judicial Nominations and Professional Diversity" at an event hosted by the Alliance for Justice (AFJ). The senator advocated for greater professional diversity of the federal bench and discussed the importance of preventing a corporate capture of the federal courts.
Senator Warren noted a report from the AFJ that shows 71% of President Obama's judicial nominees have represented primarily corporate or business clients - statistics that are broadly in line with the current composition of the federal bench. "There are some really talented judges who came from the private sector..." said Senator Warren. "But I believe that diversity of experience matters. It matters that someone has represented people other than corporate clients, that they've had real experience with people who can't afford lawyers, that they've had real experience trying to fight for the public interest."
The senator explained that for years, "the judicial nominations process was largely held hostage to an intransigent Republican minority that looked for any excuse to block President Obama's efforts to nominate federal judges," and discussed the opportunity that the Senate's rules change provides the President and Senate to ensure that the next generation of judges will represent "the best and the brightest from every corner of the legal profession."
The senator also discussed the nomination of now District Court Judge Edward Chen. "President Obama stood behind the Chen nomination," said Senator Warren. "He had to re-nominate him three times over three years before the Senate finally confirmed him. When he was sworn in, Judge Chen said that despite the obstruction that he faced during this time, he never even considered withdrawing from consideration... because, the federal bench is not just for people from large corporate law firms, or who represent only the wealthy, or who never speak out, or play it safe in their careers.'"
A video of the entire event is available here.
http://www.warren.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=351
Cites New Report on Corporate Lawyer Dominance of Federal Judiciary, Calls for More Nominees With Broad Legal Experience
Washington, DC - United States Senator Elizabeth Warren delivered remarks today on "Broadening the Bench: Judicial Nominations and Professional Diversity" at an event hosted by the Alliance for Justice (AFJ). The senator advocated for greater professional diversity of the federal bench and discussed the importance of preventing a corporate capture of the federal courts.
Senator Warren noted a report from the AFJ that shows 71% of President Obama's judicial nominees have represented primarily corporate or business clients - statistics that are broadly in line with the current composition of the federal bench. "There are some really talented judges who came from the private sector..." said Senator Warren. "But I believe that diversity of experience matters. It matters that someone has represented people other than corporate clients, that they've had real experience with people who can't afford lawyers, that they've had real experience trying to fight for the public interest."
The senator explained that for years, "the judicial nominations process was largely held hostage to an intransigent Republican minority that looked for any excuse to block President Obama's efforts to nominate federal judges," and discussed the opportunity that the Senate's rules change provides the President and Senate to ensure that the next generation of judges will represent "the best and the brightest from every corner of the legal profession."
The senator also discussed the nomination of now District Court Judge Edward Chen. "President Obama stood behind the Chen nomination," said Senator Warren. "He had to re-nominate him three times over three years before the Senate finally confirmed him. When he was sworn in, Judge Chen said that despite the obstruction that he faced during this time, he never even considered withdrawing from consideration... because, the federal bench is not just for people from large corporate law firms, or who represent only the wealthy, or who never speak out, or play it safe in their careers.'"
A video of the entire event is available here.
http://www.warren.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=351
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
147 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Elizabeth Warren To Obama: Stop Nominating So Many Corporatists [View all]
Jesus Malverde
Feb 2014
OP
So theres a plethora of non corporate conservative public interest candidates out there?
quakerboy
Feb 2014
#81
She is right. We need more public interest attorneys in our courts at both the state and federal
JDPriestly
Feb 2014
#104
I wonder what EW thinks of the Sizemore, Hurley, Clinton stuff you posted yesterday?
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#3
Elizabeth Warren is on the mark. President O, should ask her for some suggestions.
Sunlei
Feb 2014
#6
But she is NOT running for you-know-what, and has in fact already endorsed you-know-who.
Scuba
Feb 2014
#11
Sure, Senator from Mass has far more influence than the Oval Office. Yeah, that's the ticket.
Scuba
Feb 2014
#23
The best President would be one dragged kicking and screaming into the job..
SomethingFishy
Feb 2014
#41
I don't think Hillary can win, and I think we lose if she does win. I like Elizabeth a lot ....
Scuba
Feb 2014
#60
Even if Clinton wins against the GOP we lose when more legislation like the TPP passes...
cascadiance
Feb 2014
#85
Why hasn't the President tried appealing to the People? Why are his appointments mostly Repukes?
Scuba
Feb 2014
#128
Senator Warren seems not to have come to grips with the fact that those who will best represent
indepat
Feb 2014
#19
This is the second time Warren has tried to put the blame on Pres Obama instead of the Senators...
Tx4obama
Feb 2014
#35
Since the Senators give the President names, does that mean he has to accept them?
neverforget
Feb 2014
#43
Bush ignored the list once and all hell broke out. He withdrew the district judge nomination, and...
Tx4obama
Feb 2014
#47
Even though the confirmation 'cloture' rules have changed all the other rules have not...
Tx4obama
Feb 2014
#52
"Seventy-one percent of the judges he nominated primarily represented corporate interests."
morningfog
Feb 2014
#88
Blame the US Senators, they're the ones that submit the list of names to the president to pick from
Tx4obama
Feb 2014
#94
For each district court seat vacancy the two US senators from that state submit a list to ...
Tx4obama
Feb 2014
#98
My understanding is the WH has more control over Appellate level than that.
morningfog
Feb 2014
#102
Probably more control at the Circuit level, but not at the district court level...
Tx4obama
Feb 2014
#103
The president is a corporatist "Moderate Republican" in his words, and his second
Doctor_J
Feb 2014
#79
He is no republican. You do realize he is for the the minimum wage increase. He is also pro-choice
lostincalifornia
Feb 2014
#111
ok, thanks for the link. I don't agree with Obama on that characterization either though. Reagan
lostincalifornia
Feb 2014
#139
Also, DADT and DOMA are gone. But Republicans want gays to be purged from the GOP. See below
Tx4obama
Feb 2014
#147
Understood. They really should have gotten rid of the filibuster in his first term, but
lostincalifornia
Feb 2014
#112
Good point. The question is would he have appointed more progressives if he had a simple majority
lostincalifornia
Feb 2014
#115
It might have been suicidal, but that is not necessarily their perspective. In fact there was a
lostincalifornia
Feb 2014
#141
Obama oughta know, as he once worked for the NY Public Interest Research Group.
alp227
Feb 2014
#106
If people don't want corporate rule, perhaps they should stop helping them achieve it.
raouldukelives
Feb 2014
#133
AFJ: Tell your Senators: Please vote for all 29 pending judicial nominees NOW
ProSense
Feb 2014
#134