Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
1. I agree with the sentiment but.....
Thu Feb 6, 2014, 05:09 PM
Feb 2014

Arkansas is a very, very conservative state. Pryor is a "blue dog" Democrat who likely is following the orders from his owner, WalMart, to oppose any such change.

The question is whether we are better off with "blue dogs" in conservative states where the alternative is a true blood-sucking conservative or not.

While I don't appreciate the blue dog mentality which undermines core Democratic principles, as a tactical matter we may need them to vote for things we all support.

The challenge here is deciding if we are better off to jettison a "blue dog" or not. The choices will likely be a fairly blue dog Democrat (in these states at least) or a puke.

I would be more willing to hold my nose and keep the blue dog. They can be useful at times. Perhaps we can just keep them in their kennels until needed.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats who opposes the...»Reply #1