Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
2. We are fractured, and that's a big part of it
Fri Feb 7, 2014, 09:01 AM
Feb 2014

But the other issue is that we don't have a figure like the Koch Brothers who fund a very specific vision. Thus most of our candidates are in the thrall of big business; that's where the money to run comes from.

Bryant

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Call it pragmatists versus purists. JoePhilly Feb 2014 #1
It's more a matter of social class than anything Fumesucker Feb 2014 #3
Then why help Joe Sixpack be protected from pre existing conditions? JoePhilly Feb 2014 #5
I never said anything about Democrats or Republicans Fumesucker Feb 2014 #10
Call it People-centric versus corporate-centric. Scuba Feb 2014 #4
The purist label goes to those who will decry compromise at all turns. JoePhilly Feb 2014 #7
So then Elizabeth Warren and her supporters are NOT purists, as we are willing to compromise. Scuba Feb 2014 #8
They are not ... but many of their loudest supporters are. JoePhilly Feb 2014 #11
I disagree with the "very little" conclusion. Just in appointing regulators ... Scuba Feb 2014 #14
The article mentions "liberals versus centrists, populists versus the corporate wing." Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #20
The article says "Call it what you will" ... so I did. JoePhilly Feb 2014 #22
So much is said in choice of terminlogy. n/t Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #28
I don't decry compromise, nor does hardly any other Liberal tkmorris Feb 2014 #16
that would be inaccurate. Warren isn't a purist, neither is Sanders or de Blasio cali Feb 2014 #9
They are not ... many of their loudest supporters are. JoePhilly Feb 2014 #12
Of course they'd have to make deals. cali Feb 2014 #18
N.Y. Mayor At Closed AIPAC Gala: Part Of My Job Is To Defend Israel ProSense Feb 2014 #21
Such a black/white, up/down Le Taz Hot Feb 2014 #13
I used the same binary structure that the OP refers to from the article ... JoePhilly Feb 2014 #15
Meaningless jargon. Folks tossed around 'I'm a pragmatist' to dress up their opposition to equality Bluenorthwest Feb 2014 #17
Ahh ... your preferred stick. Or should I say Schtick. JoePhilly Feb 2014 #37
I prefer prostitutes vs true believers. It's so much easier to be a pragmatist when your so-called jtuck004 Feb 2014 #24
Is this why Americans get war spending & wars while the REST of the industrialized world think Feb 2014 #27
Pragmatic means doing what works for your interests. Looks like a big Fail for "centrism" Armstead Feb 2014 #29
Corporations vs the people AgingAmerican Feb 2014 #36
We are fractured, and that's a big part of it el_bryanto Feb 2014 #2
It's like the plot from Iron Man 3 Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2014 #6
the most important point is made in Paragraph 16 Enrique Feb 2014 #19
Damn, where does that leave... freebrew Feb 2014 #23
Money does. Octafish Feb 2014 #25
Good piece but, quite frankly, I'm tired of the argument wyldwolf Feb 2014 #26
In my lifetime (60 or so years)... OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #30
August, 1968. That's when the Party leaders made it clear they would rather lose Egalitarian Thug Feb 2014 #31
To wit... OilemFirchen Feb 2014 #32
I'm a huge fan of Warren, de Blasio and Bernie Sanders. TheMathieu Feb 2014 #33
cuase the 'blogger class' has SO MUCH POWER!11 xchrom Feb 2014 #34
"I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men... Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No, Liberals Don't Contro...»Reply #2