Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Like it or not, Glenn Greenwald is actually a bigot who is against immigration [View all]Aerows
(39,961 posts)10. OMG a guilt by association attack?
I tremble in fear that someone, somewhere ever had an objectionable thought, and that automatically dilutes anything they have to say in the public discourse.
My goodness, he isn't a miracle worker or a candidate for sainthood, so how can you listen to THAT GUY?
(even worse, he makes the guy I regularly beatify look bad. That should be excommunication from the Democratic party and the "good guys" party, right there.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
245 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Like it or not, Glenn Greenwald is actually a bigot who is against immigration [View all]
Cali_Democrat
Feb 2014
OP
You know...the irony is that GG's fuckup caused the white supremacist to lose the Anti-Klan case. n
msanthrope
Feb 2014
#2
"Glenn Greenwald Unethically Taped Witnesses While Working for Matt Hale, White Supremacist."
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#3
You need to stay out of theeads on racism, given the sick things you've said
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2014
#6
And you need to mind your own....! Your defense of GG has a very obvious & sickly bias.
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#8
"Latin America is but a cyst on the anus of the world"--Tarheel_Dem, 7/5/2013
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2014
#22
Not that it matters, but my reference was to Latin American leaders, not the people. But, hey...
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#34
Fuck Latin America's lame ass leaders who blame the US for all their woes. If that's "Republican",
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#62
Apparently US involvement in Latin American history wasn't on the OP's shortlist
think
Feb 2014
#127
The only thing worse than racist remarks is attempting to rationalize racist remarks.
LanternWaste
Feb 2014
#98
Yeah, I liked that one--'I'm not a racist, I just hate the liberals in charge'. nt
DisgustipatedinCA
Feb 2014
#58
Are you a fan of Correa? He concerns me. I know he's widely popular, but I really questioned some of
okaawhatever
Feb 2014
#72
good point. I may have to reevaluate Tarheel. Especially with the wording choice of
Pretzel_Warrior
Feb 2014
#92
Damn, I thought the thread was about GG defending a white supremacist. Who knew it was
Number23
Feb 2014
#139
As is apparently running up and down and thread posting to every single person that posts
Number23
Feb 2014
#165
Thanks for producing that. His venom filled personal tweets are legendary in their vile content.
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#9
What do the McCarthy-ites on this board have left but their baldly transparent tactics?
villager
Feb 2014
#33
Why in the world are you following Ron Paul's site? It is kind of creepy don't you think?
Mojorabbit
Feb 2014
#226
You mean the ones that have continually been misrepresented and taken out of context here?
Hissyspit
Feb 2014
#146
This is the standard mis-direction: To re-frame any criticism as being advocacy of "Authoritarianism
UTUSN
Feb 2014
#20
Yeah, you're the only Snowden hater here who actually gives a fuck about liberties.
EOTE
Feb 2014
#105
you know, one can be against NSA spying on citizens and think greenwald is a douchebag.
dionysus
Feb 2014
#161
"Glenn Greenwald, NSA Documents & Checkbook Journalism (Boiling Frogs Post-Sibel Edmonds)"
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#14
"Snowden called for traitors to be shot." People seem to conveniently forget that. He hates Obama
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#109
Oh, for fuck's sake! There goes that anti-war cred. If he ever had any. What's with him managing the
freshwest
Feb 2014
#116
So Greenwald AGREED with the ENTIRE Democratic Party leadership when they voted FOR the AUMF!
bvar22
Feb 2014
#198
Yes, it is very telling that the OP chose to conspicuously remove the word "illegal" from the quote
Electric Monk
Feb 2014
#63
Farm subsidies cause more immigration to the U.S. I must be racist for not liking them!
cascadiance
Feb 2014
#51
Funny how the Greenwald cultists always try to distract by bringing it back to Obama
Cali_Democrat
Feb 2014
#78
If we are doing retro quotation day, Obama has some pips 'Marrige is not a civil right' he said
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2014
#83
There is no change of mind, no nuance, no progress, once stated a man's views are etched in stone.
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2014
#87
There is the sort of change that GG likes -- the kind that jingles in his pocketses
Whisp
Feb 2014
#187
Oh, so he's getting upset about the word illegal. Only when it applies to human beings, though. Yup!
freshwest
Feb 2014
#119
He also waited to dispatch Snowden until there was a Dem administration.
great white snark
Feb 2014
#107
DING! DING! DING! And that goes for Greens as well. Remember the Naderites? n/t
Tarheel_Dem
Feb 2014
#110
Then Hillary Clinton is too. Her past positions on illegal immigration were/are like Greenwalds
riderinthestorm
Feb 2014
#117
Then good bye to you on DU when she gets the nomination since its SOP here
riderinthestorm
Feb 2014
#122
I will support our Dem candidate, especially Hillary. You however hate "bigots" like her
riderinthestorm
Feb 2014
#124
What? It's 2016 already? Damn, I slept through the DNC! Need to reset the clock again.
freshwest
Feb 2014
#163
Name calling. It's beneath you. Argue the merits of Greenwald's positions.
grahamhgreen
Feb 2014
#118
You put everything in No. 2 in present tense despite that it happened a decade ago.
Hissyspit
Feb 2014
#231
Oh, well, then, I guess the NSA's unConstitutional actions are okay, then!
TransitJohn
Feb 2014
#174
Yes. Yes, he definitely is - and has admitted as much through his blogging
BlueCaliDem
Feb 2014
#182
so anyone who points out the intellectual paucity of your ad hominem is
TheSarcastinator
Feb 2014
#188